Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT06332768
NIV Versus HFO Versus Standard Therapy Immediately After Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation in ARDS Patients
Comparison of High Flow Oxygenation, Noninvasive Ventilation and Standard Oxygen Therapy in the Early Post-extubation Period in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 60 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Northern State Medical University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The weaning failure is a paramount challenge when aggressive discontinuation of respiratory support in ARDS. The aim of the study is to improve weaning safety and efficacy by a transient postextubation non-invasive respiratory support.
Detailed description
HFNO (high-flow nasal oxygenation and NIV (non invasive ventilation) are to be randomly compared in the ARDS postextubation period.
Conditions
- Mechanical Ventilation Complication
- Weaning Failure
- Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- High-flow Oxygenation
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Respiratory support | High-flow nasal oxygenation |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2017-09-01
- Primary completion
- 2022-01-01
- Completion
- 2022-03-01
- First posted
- 2024-03-27
- Last updated
- 2024-03-27
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Russia
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06332768. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.