Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT01260935

Comparison of Laparoscopic Hill and Laparoscopic Nissen Anti-Reflux Procedures

A Prospective Randomized Single-Blinded Multi-Institutional Study Comparing the Laparoscopic Hill and Laparoscopic Nissen Anti-Reflux Procedures

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
121 (actual)
Sponsor
Swedish Medical Center · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects (good and bad) of the Laparoscopic Hill anti-reflux procedure with the Laparoscopic Nissen anti-reflux surgical procedure to see whether one is better than the other.

Detailed description

The design is a two-armed prospective single-blinded comparison between the two procedures, performed and randomized independently at the Swedish Medical Center Cancer Institute in Seattle, WA, and at Legacy Health Systems in Portland, OR, in adult patients with uncomplicated gastroesophageal reflux failing medical management. A standardized operative technique for each procedures will be utilized at both institutions, and will include intraoperative manometrics and intraoperative photographic documentation of the gastroesophageal valve, as well as placement of clips at the GE junction to accurately identify its location post-operatively. To eliminate "expertise" bias, the investigator from each institution will participate in up to 50 of the first of each of the two procedures.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDURELaparoscopic Hill RepairWith the Hill repair, stitches are placed right where the esophagus and stomach meet and attached to muscle tissue that is fixed to the spine.
PROCEDURELaparoscopic Nissen RepairWith the Nissen repair, the upper part of the stomach is wrapped around the esophagus, with some anchoring of the wrap at several locations.

Timeline

Start date
2002-11-01
Primary completion
2010-11-01
Completion
2010-11-01
First posted
2010-12-15
Last updated
2012-01-18

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01260935. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.