NCT06233630

Erector Spinae Plane Block Vs. IPACK Block with Adductor Canal Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty

• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 4
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 90 (actual)
• Sponsor: Poznan University of Medical Sciences · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 100 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block and iPACK block with Adductor Canal Block on pain management, and NLR and PLR following knee arthroplasty

Detailed description

Knee arthroplasty is one of the most common orthopedic procedures, especially in elderly patients, due to the deformation of joints. Patients may complain of severe pain due to surgical trauma and prosthesis. Regional anesthesia methods may be performed to reduce the inflammatory response, opioid consumption, and opioid-related side effects. In recent years, the influence of regional anesthesiology on reducing the inflammatory response after surgical procedures has been emphasized. However, very few studies have evaluated the effect of various methods of anesthesia on the NLR.

Conditions

• Knee Osteoarthritis
• Knee Pain Chronic
• Knee Arthritis

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DRUG	Control Test - spinal anesthesia	No peripheral nerve block Only spinal anesthesia
DRUG	Ropivacaine 0.2% Injectable Solution ESPB	ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) - L2 level, unilateral
DRUG	Ropivacaine 0.2% Injectable Solution iPACK+ACB	ultrasound guided iPACK block + Adductor Canal Block

Timeline

• Start date: 2024-03-30
• Primary completion: 2024-08-16
• Completion: 2024-08-20
• First posted: 2024-01-31
• Last updated: 2024-09-26

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Poland