Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT06160778

Intravenous Ketorolac Vs. Morphine In Children With Acute Abdominal Pain

Intravenous Ketorolac Vs. Morphine In Children Presenting With Acute Abdominal Pain And/or Suspected Appendicitis: A Multi-centre Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
495 (estimated)
Sponsor
University of Calgary · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
6 Years – 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Appendicitis is a common condition in children 6-17 years of age, and the top reason for emergency surgery in Canada. Children with appendicitis can have very bad pain in their belly. Children often need pain medications given to them through a needle in their arm called an intravenous (IV). The most common IV pain medication is a type of opioid called morphine. We know that opioids work well to improve pain, but there are risks and side effects when taking them. There are non-opioid medications that doctors can give to patients, like ketorolac. Ketorolac helps decrease inflammation and pain and has fewer side effects when a patient takes it for a short period of time. Our past and present overuse of opioids, driven by an unproven assumption that opioids work best for pain, resulted in an Opioid Crisis and doctors are now looking for alternatives. To do this, we need to prove that there are other options to treat children's pain that are just as good as opioids, with less side effects. The goal of our study is to discover if school aged children who arrive at the emergency department with belly pain, improve just as much with ketorolac as they do with morphine. To answer this question, we will need a very large number of patients in a study that includes several hospitals across Canada. With a flip of a coin, each participant will either get a single dose of morphine or a single dose of ketorolac. To make sure that our pain assessment is impartial, no one will know which medicine the child received except the pharmacist who prepared the medicine.

Detailed description

Background: Appendicitis, the most common surgical diagnosis in Canadian children aged 6-17 years, accounts for \~8000 admissions annually. Despite an ongoing opioid crisis, prescription narcotics remain a mainstay analgesic for children with suspected appendicitis. Ketorolac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), which has a safer adverse event (AE) profile than opioids, is commonly used in emergency departments (EDs) for adults; however, use in children is considered off label due to a lack of randomized trials in this patient population. We propose a multi-centre clinical trial to address this knowledge gap,informed by our team's successful pilot trial. Specific Aim 1: To determine if administering intravenous (IV) ketorolac is non inferior to IV morphine in reducing mean pain scores in children with suspected appendicitis. Hypothesis: IV ketorolac will be non-inferior to IV morphine Specific Aim 2: To determine between group differences in rates of AEs. Hypothesis: IV ketorolac will be associated with less AEs than IV morphine. Design: A randomized quadruple blind (participant, clinician, outcome assessor, investigator) parallel group double-dummy trial in 4 Canadian pediatric EDs. Eligible patients will be 6-17 years with 5-days of moderate-severe pain (vNRS ≥5 ) being investigated for suspected appendicitis, with intravenous (IV) access, will be randomized to either: 1. IV ketorolac 0.5 mg/kg up to 30 mg (intervention) + IV morphine placebo (normal saline), or 2. IV morphine 0.1 mg/kg up to 5 mg (active control) + IV ketorolac placebo (normal saline). Primary outcome: Between-group mean difference in pain on the vNRS at 60 minutes following administration. Safety outcome: Proportion of children experiencing AEs related to study drug administration. Secondary Outcomes: Between-group differences: (1) pain relief as measured on vNRS at 30, 90 and 120 minutes and at 6-8 hours; (2) proportion who achieves a 2-point vNRS (minimal important difference) pain score reduction at 60 and 120 minutes; (3) proportion of patients who change their baseline pain category (vNRS: mild 0-3, moderate 4-6, severe ≥7) at each time point; (4) time to effective analgesia as measured by the time when vNRS of \<3 is achieved (5) proportion of patients requiring additional analgesia; (6) total opioids administered (i.e., morphine equivalent mg/kg within 8 hours of treatment); (7) frequency of specific types of AEs (e.g., dizziness); (8) frequency of delayed appendicitis diagnosis; and (9) Ramsay Sedation Score at 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes. Sample size:With a non-inferiority margin of 1.0 (50% of the minimal important difference), 600 participants would give a power of 0.9 (1- β) to establish non-inferiority of ketorolac vs. morphine (significance level α = 0.05).

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGKetorolac TromethamineIntravenous ketorolac given at 0.5 mg/kg of body weight up to a maximum of 30 mg in a single dose.
DRUGMorphine SulfateIntravenous morphine given at 0.1 mg/kg of body weight up to a maximum of 5 mg in a single dose.
DRUGnormal salineIntravenous normal saline placebo (labelled as morphine) given at 0.1 mg/kg of body weight up to a maximum of 5 mg in a single dose.
DRUGNormal salineIntravenous normal saline placebo (labelled as ketorolac) given at 0.5 mg/kg of body weight up to a maximum of 30 mg in a single dose.

Timeline

Start date
2024-05-27
Primary completion
2029-01-01
Completion
2029-12-01
First posted
2023-12-07
Last updated
2024-06-24

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Canada

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06160778. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.