Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT06134492

Acyclovir in Ventilated Patients With Pneumonia and HSV-1 in BAL

Effect of Acyclovir Therapy on the Outcome of Ventilated Patients With Lower Respiratory Tract Infection and Detection of Herpes Simplex Virus in Bronchoalveolar Lavage

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
616 (estimated)
Sponsor
Jena University Hospital · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Almost 90 out of 100 people carry herpes simplex viruses (HSV). Once a person has been infected with the herpes viruses, he or she can't get rid of them for the rest of her/his life. For the most part, the viruses are in a dormant state. Only when the immune system is weakened, for example in the case of a serious illness or stress, are the viruses reactivated. They then mainly cause cold sores, which are harmless for healthy people and usually heal without therapy. However, especially in people with a weakened immune system, HSV can also cause serious infections, such as meningitis. In almost every second mechanically ventilated patient in intensive care who has pneumonia, HSV can be detected in the respiratory tract. This is caused by reactivation of the viruses as a result of the severe underlying disease and stress during intensive care therapy. Whether treatment of the herpes viruses (e.g. with acyclovir) is necessary in this situation and helps the patients to cure has not been clarified, especially as acyclovir can also cause side effects such as a deterioration in kidney function. Currently, the physicians decide to treat the herpes viruses in about half of the patients. Several studies have shown that patients for whom the physician decided to treat the viruses survived more often. However, all of these studies looked at the course of the disease only retrospectively and thus are subject to many biases (including physician selection of who receives treatment, missing data). A definitive conclusion as to whether herpesvirus therapy can be recommended cannot be drawn without doubt from these studies. Therefore, the investigators would like to investigate in a randomized controlled trial, i.e. patients are randomly assigned to the experimental (therapy of herpesviruses) or control group (no therapy of herpesviruses), the effect of therapy with acyclovir on survival in ventilated intensive care patients with lower respiratory tract infection (pneumonia) in whom a large amount of HSV was found in the respiratory tract. The goal of the study is to provide clarity on whether therapy will help patients recover.

Detailed description

Herpes-simplex virus (HSV) can be detected in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in up to 60% of mechanically ventilated (MV) ICU patients with a lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI), depending on the study population and the severity of disease. However, it remains unclear whether the detection represents a harmless viral shedding as a consequence of reactivation, reflecting the severity of the underlying disease and immunoparalysis, or a true clinical infection requiring antiviral therapy. To date, only retrospective studies have investigated the benefit of an antiviral therapy in HSV-positive ICU patients on mechanical ventilation (MV) with LRTI. In a retrospective study and additional meta-analysis on this topic a antiviral treatment was associated with an improved patient outcome, i.e.; lower all-cause hospital mortality (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.64-0.85) and lower 30-day all-cause mortality (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59-0.94; 3 studies). Aim of this study is to determine prospectively in a multicenter, randomized controlled trial whether acyclovir therapy improves outcome in ventilated ICU patients with a LRTI and HSV detection in BAL. Overall, 616 ICU patients with MV and LRTI and HSV1-PCR-detection in BAL (\>= 10E3 copies/ml) will be either randomized to receive acyclovir (10mg/kg body weight tid) for 10 days (or discharge from ICU if this is earlier) or no antiviral therapy (control group). Primary efficacy endpoint will be overall survival within 30 days comparing the acyclovir therapy and the control group. Secondary endpoints include ventilation-free days up to day 30, vasopressor-free days until day 30 and safety.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGAcyclovirDosage: 10mg/kg (current) body weight every 8 hours, dose adjustment to renal function according to technical information. Mode of administration: intravenous (i.v.)

Timeline

Start date
2024-02-20
Primary completion
2026-07-01
Completion
2026-12-01
First posted
2023-11-18
Last updated
2025-11-21

Locations

28 sites across 1 country: Germany

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06134492. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.