Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT05332327
Comparison of the Accuracy of Different Periodontal Probes for Peri-implant Pocket Registration
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- —
- Study type
- Observational
- Enrollment
- 50 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Malmö University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
Various types of periodontal probes (e.g., metal probes, plastic/bendable probes, electronic periodontal probes) are used for peri-implant pocket depth registration; however, depending on the shape and size of the prosthetic restoration an accurate peri-implant pocket registration might be impeded with standard metal probes. There is currently no systematic assessment of which probe is more accurate in peri-implant pocket registration. Therefore, peri-implant pocket registration of 50 patients with a screw-retained prosthetic restoration will be recorded with 3 different periodontal probes; i.e., with a metal probe, with a plastic probe, and with an automatic periodontal probe, before and after removal of the prosthetic restoration.
Conditions
Timeline
- Start date
- 2020-09-08
- Primary completion
- 2023-02-13
- Completion
- 2023-02-13
- First posted
- 2022-04-18
- Last updated
- 2023-03-31
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Sweden
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05332327. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.