NCT04366635

Evaluation of Two Different Grafting Techniques After Mandibular Impacted Third Molar Surgery

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix and Tricalcium Phosphate Graft Application After Mandibular Impacted Third Molar Surgery in Terms of Periodontal and Osseous Healing Distal to the Second Molar

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 36 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Konya Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 40 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

This study evaluates the effectiveness of using Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix and β-tricalcium phosphate that placed to extraction socket as a graft material in terms of periodontal damage occurred in the distal aspect of the second molar after mandibular impacted third molar surgery.

Conditions

• Periodontal Pocket
• Impacted Third Molar Tooth
• Impacted Teeth With Abnormal Position

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Impacted third molar surgery	Under local anesthesia, flap will be raised and mesioangular or horizontal impacted third molar tooth will be removed with routine technique. And then extraction socket will be irrigated with salin and will be primarily closed.
PROCEDURE	Application of mineralised plasmatic matrix	After extraction of impacted third molar tooth, Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix will be placed to the socket as a graft material and will be covered with Platelet Rich Fibrin membrane. Then wound will be primarily closed.
PROCEDURE	Application of β-tricalcium phosphate	After extraction of impacted third molar tooth, β-tricalcium phosphate will be placed to the socket as a graft material and will be covered with Platelet Rich Fibrin membrane. Then wound will be primarily closed.

Timeline

• Start date: 2020-04-27
• Primary completion: 2020-05-20
• Completion: 2020-08-20
• First posted: 2020-04-29
• Last updated: 2020-05-06

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)