NCT00552513

Early Versus Delayed Timing of Intervention in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes

An International Randomised Trial of Early Versus Delayed Invasive Strategies in Patients With Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 3,031 (actual)
• Sponsor: Population Health Research Institute · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 21 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The timing of intervention study is a prospective, randomized, international, multicentre comparison of the relative efficacy, safety, and cost effectiveness of a management strategy of coronary angiography and intervention performed within 24 hours of randomization versus delayed coronary angiography and intervention in patients after 36 hours with acute coronary syndromes (ACS).

Conditions

• Unstable Angina
• Myocardial Infarction

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Early Coronary Intervention	Perform coronary angiography and intervention (either percutaneous coronary intervention \[PCI\] or coronary artery bypass graft \[CABG\] surgery) as soon as possible (and within 24 hours of randomisation).
PROCEDURE	Delayed Coronary Intervention	Perform coronary angiography and intervention (either percutaneous coronary intervention \[PCI\] or coronary artery bypass graft \[CABG\] surgery) any time after 36 hours after randomisation.

Timeline

• Start date: 2005-05-01
• Primary completion: 2008-07-01
• Completion: 2009-02-01
• First posted: 2007-11-02
• Last updated: 2022-04-21
• Results posted: 2014-06-27

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Canada