Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT07378618

Evaluation of the Accuracy of Palatal Orthodontic Miniscrew Placement.

Accuracy of Palatal Orthodontic Miniscrew Placement: Static vs Dynamic Computer-Guided Techniques in a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40 (actual)
Sponsor
University of Roma La Sapienza · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

This randomized clinical trial has the objective of comparing the accuracy of palatal paramedian miniscrew placement using static computer-assisted surgery (s-CAS) and dynamic computer-assisted surgery (d-CAS). A population of forty subjects requiring palatal paramedian miniscrew insertion is going to be randomized into two groups to receive two miniscrews placed with s-CAS (Group A; n=20 subjects, 40 miniscrews) and d-CAS (Group B; n=20 subjects, 40 miniscrews). Preoperative digital intraoral scans and CBCT images will be used for virtual planning. Group A procedures is going to employ patient-specific surgical guides, while group B procedures is going to be performed with real-time navigation. Immediate postoperative CBCT scans will be superimposed to measure four accuracy parameters: coronal, apical, depth, and angular deviation from the planned position. Statistical analysis will include Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREComputer-guided Miniscrew insertionThis intervention consists of a standardized digital workflow for orthodontic miniscrew placement in the paramedian region of the maxillary palate. Based on this integrated dataset, miniscrew position, angulation, and insertion depth are virtually planned to achieve bicortical anchorage while respecting predefined safety margins. Miniscrew insertion is performed under local anesthesia using self-drilling orthodontic miniscrews of standardized dimensions, without pre-drilling. Depending on group allocation, placement is carried out using either a static surgical guide or real-time dynamic navigation, while imaging acquisition and planning protocols remain identical. Immediate postoperative CBCT imaging is obtained to verify miniscrew position and to allow quantitative accuracy assessment.

Timeline

Start date
2023-12-01
Primary completion
2025-09-01
Completion
2026-01-10
First posted
2026-01-30
Last updated
2026-01-30

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Italy

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07378618. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.