Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT07363889

Spring Loaded Syringe for Active Silicon Oil Extraction

Vitrectomy Machine Versus Spring Loaded Syringe for Active Silicon Oil Extraxtion

Status
Recruiting
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200 (estimated)
Sponsor
Sohag University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The aim of our study is to compare between two techniques used for active SOR. The outcomes include efficiency and safety. Patients with silicon filled eyes and prepared for SOR 540 eyes of 505 patients (one eye in 470 patients, and both eyes in 35 patients) were enrolled in the study. All eyes underwent SOR using 23-Gauge PPV. The eyes were classified according to the surgical technique used for SOR into two groups:- Group A: SOR was performed using SO extraction program built in Optikon vitrectomy device Group B: SOR was performed using modified spring loaded syringe.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEVitrectomy machineActive silicon oil extraction through 23G pars plana system vitrectomy machine
DEVICESpring loaded syringe5 mml syringe with spring in its plunger and rubber connection

Timeline

Start date
2022-01-04
Primary completion
2026-12-30
Completion
2027-05-01
First posted
2026-01-23
Last updated
2026-01-23

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07363889. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.

Spring Loaded Syringe for Active Silicon Oil Extraction (NCT07363889) · Clinical Trials Directory