Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT07333859
Effect of IV Lidocaine on Duodenal Peristalsis and Sedation in ERCP
Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion on Duodenal Peristalsis, Sedation Quality and Rescue Spasmolytic Requirement in ERCP Procedures: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 120 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Ankara City Hospital Bilkent · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 85 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of intravenous lidocaine infusion on duodenal peristalsis during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The study compares lidocaine against a placebo to determine if lidocaine can reduce the need for rescue spasmolytics (hyoscine-N-butylbromide or glucagon), decrease propofol consumption, and improve hemodynamic stability.
Detailed description
Duodenal peristalsis can hinder successful cannulation during ERCP. Traditionally, antispasmodics like hyoscine-N-butylbromide are used but have side effects. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial includes 120 patients (ASA I-III) undergoing elective ERCP. "All patients will undergo a standardized sedation protocol managed by an anesthesiologist. Sedation induction will be performed with a loading dose of propofol (0.5-1 mg/kg). Maintenance of sedation will be achieved through a continuous infusion of propofol (40-60 µg/kg/min), supplemented by intermittent bolus doses of 20-30 mg as clinically required. The sedation level will be dynamically titrated by the physician to maintain a target Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) score of 3-4 and Bispectral Index (BIS) values between 60 and 80. This approach ensures patient comfort and procedural stability while minimizing respiratory depression Patients will be randomized 1:1 into two groups: Group L (Lidocaine): IV bolus 1.0 mg/kg before induction + 2.0 mg/kg/h continuous infusion during the procedure. Group C (Control): Equal volume of 0.9% Saline. Primary outcome is the "Rescue Spasmolytic Requirement" based on endoscopist's evaluation. Secondary outcomes include duodenal peristalsis score (Suzuki Scale) assessed via video review by a blinded endoscopist, total propofol consumption, and recovery times.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Lidocaine Hydrochloride 2% | 1.0 mg/kg IV bolus followed by 2.0 mg/kg/h IV infusion during the procedure. Propofol Induction: 0.5-1 mg/kg loading dose, Maintenance: Continuous infusion of 40-60 µg/kg/min, supplemented by intermittent 20-30 mg boluses as clinically required. |
| OTHER | 0.9 % Normal Saline | IV bolus and infusion of 0.9% NaCl matched in volume and rate to the study drug. Propofol Induction: 0.5-1 mg/kg loading dose, Maintenance: Continuous infusion of 40-60 µg/kg/min, supplemented by intermittent 20-30 mg boluses as clinically required.. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2026-02-11
- Primary completion
- 2026-02-11
- Completion
- 2026-03-15
- First posted
- 2026-01-12
- Last updated
- 2026-04-08
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07333859. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.