Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT07287332

BLOOM: Pragmatic Feasibility Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
300 (estimated)
Sponsor
Mayo Clinic · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The goal of this study is to compare two different ways of dosing cefepime, an antibiotic for very sick patients - the usual approach to dosing or a new dosing method. The new dosing method uses only doses that are available in normal care, but choosing between the different doses is based on more information about the patient's body including their kidney function. The primary purpose of this study is to test how easy it is for healthcare professionals to use the new dosing method and how best to conduct the trial. The study will also assess if the new dosing method helps patients recover faster and reduces side effects.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
OTHERUp-front individualized dosing algorithmAn individualized cefepime dosing algorithm will be used to determine the cefepime dose and interval. The dose recommendation will be provided using the EHR-prompts to the clinical care team and ordered and/or verified by the ICU pharmacist using an established collaborative practice agreement. As a pragmatic trial, at any point care teams may modify the empiric or subsequent dose based on their clinical judgement.
OTHERUsual CareThe standard of care group will receive empiric dosing guided by an institutional antimicrobial guide. Cefepime is typically dosed at 0.5-2 g every 8-24 h according to categorical thresholds of estimated creatinine clearance (eGFRcr). Cystatin C and eGFRcr-cys can be calculated and used at clinicians' discretion to aid in drug dose determination.

Timeline

Start date
2026-01-15
Primary completion
2027-03-01
Completion
2027-07-01
First posted
2025-12-17
Last updated
2026-02-06

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07287332. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.