NCT07231380

A Comparison of Cyclic Manual Direct Aspiration Thrombectomy (Plunger Technique) vs. Static Manual Direct Aspiration Thrombectomy for Treatment of Acute Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke

Plunger Stroke Trial: A Comparison of Cyclic Manual Direct Aspiration Thrombectomy (Plunger Technique) vs. Static Manual Direct Aspiration Thrombectomy for Treatment of Acute Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke With the Raptor Aspiration Catheter

• Status: Not Yet Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 500 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Vanderbilt University Medical Center · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

This prospective, randomized controlled trial will compare two manual aspiration techniques for treating acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion: cyclic aspiration (Plunger technique) and static aspiration. Both techniques use FDA-approved devices (Raptor Aspiration Catheters and VacLok syringes) and are standard of care. Approximately 500 participants across 20 sites will be randomized to one of the two techniques. The primary endpoint is First Pass Effect (TICI 2c/3 after first attempt), with secondary endpoints including overall recanalization and 90-day functional outcomes. Results will address a critical gap in optimizing aspiration thrombectomy techniques.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, multi-center trial designed to compare two manual aspiration thrombectomy techniques for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO): Cyclic Manual Aspiration (Plunger Technique): A rhythmic, cyclic application of suction, coined by Principal Investigator Dr. Michael Froehler. Static Manual Aspiration: Continuous suction without modulation. Both techniques will utilize FDA-approved devices, the Raptor Aspiration Catheter and VacLok Syringe which are routinely employed in clinical practice for stroke treatment. While both approaches are widely accepted, there is currently limited comparative data evaluating their relative efficacy and safety. The study will enroll approximately 500 participants across 20 sites. Eligible patients will present with acute ischemic stroke involving the terminal internal carotid artery (ICA) or M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA). Participants will be randomized centrally in a 1:1 ratio to one of the two aspiration techniques. Primary Endpoint: First Pass Effect (FPE): Defined as achieving a Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) score of 2c or 3 following the first attempt at clot removal. Secondary Endpoints: Overall recanalization rates 90-day functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale) Successful catheter navigation to the occlusion site Procedural efficiency metrics Both techniques are considered standard of care at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) and other participating institutions. The study does not introduce any novel devices or untested procedures; therefore, risks to participants are minimal and comparable to routine thrombectomy procedures. This trial addresses a critical gap in current knowledge regarding optimal manual aspiration techniques for direct aspiration thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. Results will provide high-quality evidence to inform best practices, potentially improving procedural efficiency and patient outcomes.

Conditions

• Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients
• Large Vessel Occlusion

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Plunger Technique	Rhythmic, cyclic application of suction using FDA-approved devices (Raptor Aspiration Catheter and VacLok Syringe) for clot removal in acute ischemic stroke.
PROCEDURE	Static Manual Aspiration Thrombectomy	Continuous suction without modulation using FDA-approved devices (Raptor Aspiration Catheter and VacLok Syringe) for clot removal in acute ischemic stroke.

Timeline

• Start date: 2026-03-01
• Primary completion: 2026-12-01
• Completion: 2027-03-01
• First posted: 2025-11-17
• Last updated: 2026-01-08