NCT07196865

Comparison of the Clinical Effects of Open, Closed, and Semi-close Hemorrhoidectomy.

Comparison of the Clinical Effects of Open, Closed, and Semi-close Hemorrhoidectomy: Study Protocol for a Single-center, Prospective, Open-label and Randomized Clinical Trial.

• Status: Not Yet Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 378 (estimated)
• Sponsor: The Affiliated Hospital of Putian University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 75 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

This study compares three different ways surgeons close the wound after removing hemorrhoids (piles): leaving it completely open, stitching it completely closed, or stitching only half of it closed (semi-closed). The goal is to see which method leads to faster healing, less pain, fewer complications, and better long-term results. Patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy will be randomly assigned to one of the three groups. All patients will receive standard post-operative care. Researchers will measure healing time, pain levels, need for pain medication, hospital stay, complications, and check if hemorrhoids come back within one year.

Detailed description

Hemorrhoids are a very common condition, and when surgery is needed, there is no consensus on the best way to manage the surgical wound afterward. This single-center, prospective, randomized clinical trial aims to directly compare the clinical outcomes of the three primary wound management techniques: open, closed, and semi-closed hemorrhoidectomy. A total of 378 patients will be randomly assigned to one of the three treatment groups. The primary focus is on comparing key short-term outcomes, including the time it takes for the wound to fully heal, the length of the hospital stay, and the rate of complications such as surgical site infection, bleeding, and urinary retention. Secondary outcomes will provide a broader picture of patient recovery. Pain will be carefully assessed using a standardized pain scale (Visual Analog Scale) on multiple days after surgery and by tracking the total amount of pain medication required during hospitalization. Furthermore, to understand the long-term effectiveness of each technique, the study will follow patients for one year after surgery to assess their quality of life and monitor for any recurrence of hemorrhoids. This is the first clinical trial to evaluate all three techniques within the same study. The results are expected to provide high-quality evidence to help surgeons choose the most effective wound management strategy, ultimately improving patient care and recovery after hemorrhoid surgery.

Conditions

• Hemorrhoids

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Open Hemorrhoidectomy	Patients in this group undergo a hemorrhoidectomy procedure where, after external stripping and internal ligation, the surgical wound is left entirely open without sutures to heal by secondary intention. All patients receive standard postoperative care including potassium permanganate rinses and povidone-iodine disinfection.
PROCEDURE	Closed Hemorrhoidectomy (Ferguson Technique)	Patients in this group undergo a hemorrhoidectomy procedure where, after achieving hemostasis, the entire surgical wound is closed primarily using interrupted non-absorbable sutures. All patients receive standard postoperative care including potassium permanganate rinses and povidone-iodine disinfection.
PROCEDURE	Semi-Closed Hemorrhoidectomy	Patients in this group undergo a hemorrhoidectomy procedure where, after achieving hemostasis, the distal half of the incision (away from the anal canal) is closed with interrupted sutures, while the proximal half remains open. All patients receive standard postoperative care including potassium permanganate rinses and povidone-iodine disinfection.

Timeline

• Start date: 2026-04-01
• Primary completion: 2026-12-01
• Completion: 2026-12-30
• First posted: 2025-09-29
• Last updated: 2026-03-04