Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT07140146

Trehalose vs Glycine Air-Polishing in Peri-Implant Mucositis Treatment

Comparison of Trehalose and Glycine Air-Polishing Powders in the Supportive Treatment of Peri-Implant Mucositis and Their Effect on Implant Surface Integrity: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40 (estimated)
Sponsor
University of Pavia · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

This randomized controlled clinical trial investigates the effectiveness of trehalose powder compared to glycine powder when used in air-polishing during supportive therapy for peri-implant mucositis, a reversible inflammatory condition affecting the soft tissues around dental implants. A total of 40 adult patients with peri-implant mucositis will be enrolled and randomly assigned to receive non-surgical periodontal therapy combined with air-polishing using either trehalose powder (test group) or glycine powder (control group). Clinical parameters will be evaluated at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. These include Plaque Index (PI), Bleeding on Probing (BoP), Probing Pocket Depth (PPD), and Bleeding Score (BS), in order to assess plaque accumulation, inflammation, and bleeding. The primary objective is to compare the reduction in plaque levels between the two groups over the study period. Secondary outcomes include evaluation of changes in gingival inflammation and probing depths, as well as assessment of implant surface integrity through in vitro scanning electron microscopy (SEM) after treatment. The aim of the study is to determine whether trehalose powder offers improved clinical outcomes and greater implant surface preservation compared to glycine powder in the non-surgical management of peri-implant mucositis.

Detailed description

Peri-implant mucositis is a reversible inflammatory condition affecting the soft tissues surrounding dental implants and represents an early stage in the progression toward peri-implantitis if left untreated. Mechanical debridement combined with minimally invasive biofilm removal strategies has become the cornerstone of current supportive therapy. Among the available options, air-polishing powders have shown favorable outcomes in biofilm disruption without damaging implant surfaces or peri-implant tissues. This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of trehalose powder versus glycine powder in supportive treatment of peri-implant mucositis. Trehalose is a disaccharide with documented antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and cytoprotective properties, potentially enhancing tissue healing. Glycine, an amino acid widely used in air-polishing, has proven effective in biofilm removal with high biocompatibility and minimal abrasiveness. Forty patients diagnosed with peri-implant mucositis will be randomly assigned to two groups: a test group receiving supportive periodontal therapy plus air-polishing with trehalose powder, and a control group receiving the same protocol with glycine powder. Clinical outcomes, including plaque accumulation, bleeding on probing, probing pocket depth, and bleeding score, will be assessed at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months. In addition, in vitro scanning electron microscopy (SEM) will evaluate implant surface integrity after treatment. The study is designed to provide new clinical and morphological evidence on the potential benefits of trehalose in peri-implant maintenance protocols and to clarify whether it may represent a valid alternative to glycine for long-term implant health.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICETrehalose Powder Air-PolishingAir-polishing procedure using trehalose-based powder (particle size \<65 µm, low abrasiveness) applied supra- and subgingivally with a professional air-polishing device in patients diagnosed with peri-implant mucositis. The intervention is combined with non-surgical debridement using manual curettes and ultrasonic scalers. The procedure is performed at baseline (T0), and repeated at 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3). Clinical outcomes assessed include Plaque Index (PI), Bleeding on Probing (BoP), Probing Pocket Depth (PPD), and Bleeding Score (BS). Implant surfaces are also evaluated in vitro using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to assess any surface alterations after powder application.
DEVICEGlycine Powder Air-PolishingAir-polishing procedure using glycine-based powder (particle size \~25 µm, amino acid composition) applied supra- and subgingivally with a professional air-polishing device in patients with peri-implant mucositis. This treatment is combined with standard non-surgical supportive peri-implant therapy involving manual and ultrasonic debridement. The procedure is performed at baseline (T0), and repeated at 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3). The intervention aims to reduce plaque accumulation and inflammation. Clinical parameters recorded include PI, BoP, PPD, and BS. Implant surfaces are also assessed in vitro via SEM to compare the effects of glycine versus trehalose on implant surface integrity.

Timeline

Start date
2025-08-30
Primary completion
2026-06-01
Completion
2026-06-10
First posted
2025-08-24
Last updated
2026-02-20

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Italy

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07140146. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.

Trehalose vs Glycine Air-Polishing in Peri-Implant Mucositis Treatment (NCT07140146) · Clinical Trials Directory