Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT07105540

Comparison of Injection Techniques in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Comparison of Hydrodissection With 5% Dextrose and Perineural Corticosteroid Injection in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Prospective Study

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
53 (actual)
Sponsor
Ankara Etlik City Hospital · Other Government
Sex
All
Age
20 Years – 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the effects of ultrasound-guided hydrodissection with 5% dextrose and perineural corticosteroid injection on the clinical parameters of carpal tunnel syndrome, as well as to evaluate the long-term efficacy of these treatments.

Detailed description

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), the most prevalent peripheral compressive neuropathy, manifests primarily with sensory disturbances such as pain, numbness, and nocturnal paresthesia. Treatment options for CTS differ considerably depending on the severity of symptoms, and typically include splinting, physiotherapy, local injection therapies, and surgical release. Hydrodissection is an ultrasound-guided technique that has recently gained increased attention for its role in the management of nerve entrapment syndromes. The technique uses fluid injection to separate the nerve from nearby tissues. This may reduce perineural adhesions and improve the patient's symptoms. In hydrodissection, normal saline, 5% dextrose, or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) can be used as injectates. Recently, hydrodissection with 5% dextrose has become the most commonly used approach. Several studies in the literature have demonstrated that perineural hydrodissection with 5% dextrose provides more favorable outcomes than corticosteroid injections in patients with mild to moderate CTS, particularly at 4 to 6 months post-injection. However, it remains unclear whether hydrodissection leads to a reduction in the cross-sectional area of the median nerve. In addition, studies examining the procedural details of hydrodissection are limited. Therefore, further clinical research is needed to better understand and validate the technique. Ultrasound-guided hydrodissection for CTS is performed using a 12 MHz linear array transducer probe (GE Logiq P9, GE Healthcare, Boston, MA). The median nerve (MN) is visualized at the scaphoid-pisiform level. In the intervention group, 2.5 ml of 5% dextrose is injected via an in-plane ulnar approach to separate the MN from the transverse carpal ligament, followed by an additional 2.5 ml of normal saline (NS) injected to separate the MN from the flexor tendons. In the control group, perineural injection of 1 ml betamethasone is administered around the MN using the same ultrasound device and probe.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUG5% DextroseUltrasound-guided hydrodissection is performed using a 12 MHz linear transducer (GE Logiq P9, GE Healthcare) via an in-plane ulnar approach under sterile conditions. 2.5 ml of 5% dextrose will be injected via an in-plane ulnar approach to mechanically separate the median nerve from the transverse carpal ligament. Subsequently, an additional 2.5 ml of 5% dextrose will be administered to separate the nerve from adjacent flexor tendons. The total injection volume will be 5 ml.
DRUGBetamethasone and local anestheticUltrasound-guided perineural injection is performed using a 12 MHz linear transducer (GE Logiq P9, GE Healthcare) via an in-plane ulnar approach under sterile conditions. A total of 2 ml solution (1 ml betamethasone and 1 ml 2% lidocaine) is injected perineurally around the median nerve under ultrasound guidance at the scaphoid-pisiform level.

Timeline

Start date
2025-08-05
Primary completion
2026-02-05
Completion
2026-02-05
First posted
2025-08-06
Last updated
2026-02-12

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07105540. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.