Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Not Yet Recruiting

Not Yet RecruitingNCT07075003

NOL-Guided vs Conventional Intraoperative Opioid Infusion on Outcomes in Geriatric Patients

Effect of NOL-Guided vs Conventional Intraoperative Opioid Infusion on Outcomes in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Lumbar Stabilization Surgery

Status
Not Yet Recruiting
Phase
Study type
Observational
Enrollment
80 (estimated)
Sponsor
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
65 Years – 90 Years
Healthy volunteers

Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the effects of conventional methods and goal-directed therapy guided by pain monitoring on total remifentanil dosage, wake-up time, and complications in geriatric patients undergoing lumbar stabilization surgery.

Detailed description

With the aging population, the number of geriatric patients undergoing surgery is increasing daily. One of the anesthesiologists' main responsibilities is to prevent intraoperative pain and related complications. Opioids have been known for thousands of years as valuable tools for pain management and remain the cornerstone of perioperative analgesia today (1). Remifentanil is currently the most commonly used opioid during the intraoperative period due to its potent analgesic properties, short duration of action, and metabolism by plasma enzymes. While it may improve hemodynamic stability, remifentanil can also cause hypotension and bradycardia. Prolonged remifentanil use may lead to hyperalgesia, increasing the need for postoperative opioid analgesics and consequently leading to opioid-related side effects. In elderly patients, changes in body composition, drug sensitivity, and hepatic/renal metabolism require more cautious opioid administration. Optimizing remifentanil infusion dosing during surgery may reduce total opioid consumption and thus decrease side effects such as wake-up time, postoperative pain, and nausea. In conventional use, remifentanil is administered as a continuous infusion, and dosage adjustments are made based on heart rate and blood pressure changes to estimate pain levels. However, with goal-directed therapy guided by pain monitoring, more effective analgesia can be achieved. These applications are selected based on the clinician's experience and preferences. While some publications report that total remifentanil use decreases in patients with dose adjustments guided by pain monitoring, evidence is lacking regarding which method is superior in terms of patient outcomes in elderly populations.The aim of this study is to compare the effects of conventional methods and goal-directed therapy guided by pain monitoring on total remifentanil dosage, wake-up time, and complications in geriatric patients undergoing lumbar stabilization surgery. After obtaining informed consent, a total of 80 geriatric patients undergoing lumbar stabilization surgery will be included. Once on the operating table, all patients will receive standard monitoring including peripheral oxygen saturation, non-invasive blood pressure, ECG, and anesthesia depth. All patients will receive intravenous 2-2.5 mg/kg propofol under Sedline guidance, and remifentanil via target-controlled infusion at an effect-site concentration of 4 ng/ml. After anesthesia depth falls below 50, 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium will be administered. Maintenance anesthesia will be with 1-2% sevoflurane in 40/60% oxygen/air mixture at 2 L flow. The method of remifentanil administration will be determined by the attending anesthesiologist. Demographic data (age, height, weight, gender, comorbidities, ASA score) will be recorded. Hemodynamic parameters (blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, end-tidal CO₂), remifentanil dosage, and NOL levels (for Group 2) will be recorded every 15 minutes during the surgery. At the end of surgery, the following will be documented: Total remifentanil dosage Blood loss and transfusion volume Number of hypotensive events (MAP \<55) Wake-up time Total surgical time NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) pain scores Nausea-vomiting scores In the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), pain and nausea-vomiting scores will be evaluated at the 10th, 20th, and 30th minutes, along with duration of PACU stay. During ward follow-up, pain scores, nausea-vomiting scores, administered medications, and length of postoperative hospital stay will be recorded at 1, 3, 6, and 24 hours. Nausea-vomiting will be assessed using a 4-point scale: 0: none 1. nausea without vomiting 2. nausea with vomiting 3. vomiting more than twice Pain will be assessed using the NRS scale.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEnociceptive levelremifentanil infusion dose adjustment according to the changes of nociceptive level

Timeline

Start date
2025-07-01
Primary completion
2025-09-01
Completion
2025-10-01
First posted
2025-07-20
Last updated
2025-07-20

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07075003. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.