Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT07067866

Weaning Approaches for Vasopressin in Sepsis

Weaning Approaches for Vasopressin in Sepsis - a Randomized Controlled Trial of Titrated Versus Abrupt Discontinuation During Stabilization of Septic Shock - WAVES Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
82 (estimated)
Sponsor
Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceicao · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

In this study, we aim to evaluate the incidence of hypotension during vasopressin weaning by comparing two methods - titrated reduction versus abrupt withdrawal - through the conduct of a randomized clinical trial.

Detailed description

Catecholamine infusions are usually tapered gradually in a titrated manner. However, little is known about how to manage adjunctive therapies such as vasopressin. While catecholamines have a short half-life (2-3 minutes), vasopressin's half-life ranges from 10 to 20 minutes. Although endogenous vasopressin levels are depleted in the early phase of shock, they are restored during recovery. Given its pharmacokinetic profile and the endogenous dynamics across different phases of shock, the optimal approach to vasopressin withdrawal - whether titrated or abrupt - remains unclear. In 2021, a study was published comparing abrupt versus gradual vasopressin discontinuation. This was a retrospective observational study including 1,318 patients. Using ICU length of stay as the primary outcome, no significant difference was observed between groups (abrupt discontinuation: 7.9 days; gradual discontinuation: 7.3 days; p = 0.6). Similarly, there was no difference in the incidence of clinically significant hypotension (abrupt: 39.7%; gradual: 41.7%; p = 0.53). However, when stratifying patients based on whether catecholamine infusions were still ongoing at the time of vasopressin discontinuation, the results reversed in terms of ICU stay (abrupt: 9.2 days; gradual: 7.6 days), although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.24). In 2023, another retrospective observational study was published comparing abrupt versus gradual vasopressin withdrawal, including 74 patients. No difference was found in the incidence of clinically significant hypotension (abrupt: 57.1%; gradual: 52.3%; p = 0.68), nor in ICU length of stay. It is important to note, however, that in this cohort only patients who had already discontinued catecholamines prior to vasopressin withdrawal were included.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
OTHERTitrated weaning of vasopressin.The titrated group will follow the vasopressin weaning protocol used in the DOVSS study (reduction of 0.01 U/min per hour).
OTHERAbrupt weaning of vasopressin.The abrupt group will discontinue the vasopressin infusion at the time of randomization, without dose titration.

Timeline

Start date
2025-10-01
Primary completion
2027-12-31
Completion
2028-10-01
First posted
2025-07-16
Last updated
2026-01-02

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Brazil

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07067866. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.