Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT06946160

A Non-inferiority Clinical Trial to Compare Efficacy and Safety of Abobotulinumtoxin A (Espad Pharmed) Versus AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®, Ipsen Co.) for Correction of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines

A Phase I/III, Randomized, Two-armed, Double-blinded, Parallel, Active-controlled, Non-inferiority Clinical Trial to Compare Efficacy and Safety of AbobotulinumtoxinA (Espad Pharmed) Versus AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®, Ipsen Co.) for Correction of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
146 (actual)
Sponsor
Espad Pharmed · Industry
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AbobotulinumtoxinA (produced by Espad Pharmed Darou Co.) for correction of moderate to severe glabellar lines. Hypothesis: AbobotulinumtoxinA (produced by Espad Pharmed Darou Co.) has acceptable efficacy and safety profile for correction of moderate to severe glabellar lines. Primary Outcome: To verify the non-inferiority of the efficacy of AbobotulinumtoxinA (produced by Espad Pharmed Darou Co.) compared with AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®, produced by Ipsen Co.) by percentage of responders at maximum frown at day 30 after treatment. Researchers will compare the efficacy and safety profile of AbobotulinumtoxinA (produced by Espad Pharmed Darou Co.) with AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®, produced by Ipsen Co.). The study is designed as phase III, randomized, two armed, double-blind, parallel, active controlled, non-inferiority clinical trial. Participants received a total dose of 40-60 units into 3 to 5 sites. After two weeks, a touch-up intervention could be done based on physician's assessment.

Detailed description

The study schedule includes Visit 0 (Screening), Visit 1 (Intervention, Day 0), and Follow-up Visits 2 (Day 14), 3 (Day 30), 4 (Day 90), and 5 (Day 120). At Visit 0, informed consent is obtained, and eligibility is assessed through initial evaluations and review of inclusion and exclusion criteria. At Visit 1, subjects are randomized (1:1) and receive the investigational treatment. Full-face photographs are obtained at Visit 1 (Before receiving the investigational treatment), and at Follow-up Visits 2, 3, 4, and 5, in both resting state and maximum frown. Efficacy is evaluated at Visits 3, 4, and 5. All adverse events are Recorded at all visits.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGAbobotulinumtoxin A (Espad Pharmed Darou Co.)Vial of Abobotulinumtoxin A (produced by Espad Pharmed Darou Co.), administered via deep intramuscular injection
DRUGAbobotulinumtoxin A (Ipsen Co.)Vial of AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®, produced by Ipsen Co.), administered via deep intramuscular injection

Timeline

Start date
2024-05-28
Primary completion
2025-02-18
Completion
2025-02-18
First posted
2025-04-27
Last updated
2025-05-07

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Iran

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06946160. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.

A Non-inferiority Clinical Trial to Compare Efficacy and Safety of Abobotulinumtoxin A (Espad Pharmed) Versus Abobotulin (NCT06946160) · Clinical Trials Directory