NCT06849570

Assessment of the PEEP Responsiveness to Titrate End-expiratory Pressure and of the Need for Muscle Relaxation During Prone Positioning in Moderate-to-severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Master Protocol

• Status: Not Yet Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 1,200 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

Despite best supportive care, mortality of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrom (ARDS) remains high. In the absence of specific treatments, providing safe and efficient mechanical ventilation (MV) is key to survival. The use of low tidal volumes (VT) and plateau pressures (PPLAT) improves survival in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), but the safest VT to be applied for each patient remains unknown. Whether targeting low ∆P instead of a 6 mL/kg VT improves outcome has not been tested prospectively. The optimal method to set PEEP is also a matter of debate. As the amount of potentially recruitable lung vary widely among patients and is strongly associated with the response to PEEP, it may be necessary to tailor PEEP settings based on the response to a PEEP trial. The first aim is to test a personalized approach to set PEEP widely supported by the literature. The first hypothesis is that i) patients with greater amounts of recruitable lung may benefit from higher PEEP levels, provided that attention is paid to maintain ∆P below 14 cmH2O, ii) setting PEEP based on results of a PEEP-responsiveness test improves survival as compared to low- and high-PEEP strategies applied independently of the patient response. Apart from VT reduction and PPLAT control below 30 cmH2O, only 2 interventions demonstrated a reduction of mortality in large RCTs: a 48-hour continuous infusion of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) at the acute phase of ARDS6 and the use of prone positioning (PP). Whereas there is little doubt on the utility of PP in patients with PaO2/FiO2 ratio \< 150 mmHg, there is more controversy on the impact of NMBAs on survival. Despite a strong rationale and a very widespread use in clinical practice, no current guidelines answer the question of the best timing of muscle relaxation in moderate to severe ARDS patients treated with PP. As a second aim, the hypothesis is that the early systematic and combined use of NMBAs improved survival of patients with moderate to severe ARDS requiring prone positioning after optimization of PEEP settings.

Conditions

• Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
• Intensive Care Units (ICUs)

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
OTHER	Minimal distension	Patients receive tidal volume (VT) of 6 mL/kg and conservative positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) setting.
OTHER	Maximal Recruitment	Patients receive tidal volume adjusted to limit plateau pressure (∆P) to 14 cmH2O and the highest possible PEEP while maintaining plateau pressure (PPLAT) ≤ 27 cmH2O.
OTHER	Prone position + early NMBAs	NMBAs given as soon as possible after randomization
OTHER	Prone position + rescue NMBAs	NMBAs given only as a rescue

Timeline

• Start date: 2025-04-01
• Primary completion: 2028-04-01
• Completion: 2029-04-01
• First posted: 2025-02-27
• Last updated: 2025-02-27