NCT06671041

Treating Lid Wiper Epitheliopathy

Treating Lid Wiper Epitheliopathy With Perfluorohexyloctane

• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 4
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 52 (actual)
• Sponsor: Southern College of Optometry · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

Lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) is a relatively new entry into the abundance of clinical ocular surface health signs. LWE was first reported in 2002 as a potential cause for dry eye disease (DED) (Korb et al., 2002). This clinical sign is visualised by everting the eyelid after a dye has been applied and observing the palpebral conjunctiva proximal to the eyelashes

Detailed description

Lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) is a relatively new entry into the abundance of clinical ocular surface health signs. LWE was first reported in 2002 as a potential cause for dry eye disease. This clinical sign is visualised by everting the eyelid after a dye has been applied and observing the palpebral conjunctiva proximal to the eyelashes. An observable line at the mucocutaneous junction, called the line of Marx, is present in all eyelids and any further staining of the tissue in the palpebral marginal conjunctiva can be regarded as LWE. LWE has been described as a micro-trauma caused by inadequate ocular lubrication and/or excessive friction. The lid wiper is one of the most sensitive conjunctival tissue areas of the ocular surface and upper eyelid LWE has been reported to be highly correlated to ocular surface discomfort and DED Korb, theorised some plausible aetiologies for LWE. They were all ultimately linked to frictional related damaged initiated by 1) tear film dysfunction not including tear volume (since normal Schirmer testing was an inclusion in their study), 2) localised disorders of the lid wiper itself, 3) aberrant blinking, 4) ocular surface abnormalities at the cellular level (subclinical) to initiate excessive localised trauma, and 5) conditions that would lead to inflammation of the lid wiper. The TFOS executive summary determined that a complete review of the clinical trials revealed a potential link of LWE to DED and suggested that future trials be performed to make conclusions as to which interventions might deliver the greatest impact Because LWE has been linked to DED, most of the proposed treatment strategies to relieve LWE have paralleled after treatments for DED and MGD. Treatment options fall into several categories. They are as follows: blinking, tear supplements and lubricants, tear retention agents, tear stimulants (secretagogues), biological tear substitutes, anti-inflammatory therapy, essential fatty acids, treatment of MGD and environmental strategies (including in-office treatments). Excessive tear evaporation due to a deficient lipid layer is believed to be the most common cause of DED, and most evaporative DED is associated with MGD. Perfluorohexyloctane (PFHO) ophthalmic solution (MIEBO™; Bausch + Lomb) is a preservative-free eye drop that has demonstrated the ability to form a long-lasting barrier that inhibits evaporation in preclinical studies. FDA approval of PFHO was based on results from 2 pivotal clinical trials (GOBI \[NCT04139798\] and MOJAVE \[NCT04567329\]) in patients with DED and clinical signs of MGD, which demonstrated consistent improvements in both signs and symptoms of DED (Karpecki et al., 2023; Vittitow et al., 2023). PFHO is the first and only FDA-approved eye drop that directly targets tear

Conditions

• Dry Eye
• Visual Acuity

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DRUG	Preservative Free eye drop	Participants were required to use a lubricating eye drop

Timeline

• Start date: 2024-05-27
• Primary completion: 2024-08-14
• Completion: 2024-08-30
• First posted: 2024-11-04
• Last updated: 2025-02-25

Locations

4 sites across 1 country: United States

Regulatory

• FDA-regulated drug study