Trials / Not Yet Recruiting
Not Yet RecruitingNCT06623812
Alternative ProtEin Satiety Study (APES Study)
Satiety Responses of Meals Consisting of Different Protein Sources
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 50 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Singapore Institute of Food and Biotechnology Innovation · Other Government
- Sex
- Male
- Age
- 21 Years – 50 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
This project aims to study the effects of different protein quality (i.e. high vs. low) and protein sources (i.e. plant protein vs. conventional animal protein) on post-meal satiety and satisfaction. The protein quality score of meals will be calculated using the published digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS). The proposed study will investigate the link between protein quality, protein source, and the post-meal satiety responses, using a realistic lunch meal approach, in humans. Other than the self-reported visual analogue scale (VAS) satiety response, the postprandial glucose dips (i.e. 2-3hours post-meal) will be collected by continuous glucose monitoring (CGMS) as an objective indicator of postprandial self-reported hunger and subsequent energy intake. In addition, the oral processing behaviours of participants will be captured and compared between the test meals.
Detailed description
Aim: To investigate how differences in protein quality (i.e. high vs low quality) and protein sources (i.e. plant vs animal proteins) influence the satisfaction, satiety responses (fullness over the time) and subsequent food intake.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OTHER | Behavioral: Post- meal satiety and subsequent ad-libitum meal energy intake | Investigate differences in post meal satiety and subsequent post meal energy intake after consuming fixed portion meals with different protein source and/ or different protein quality |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2024-10-01
- Primary completion
- 2024-12-01
- Completion
- 2024-12-01
- First posted
- 2024-10-02
- Last updated
- 2024-10-02
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06623812. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.