NCT06506448

Risk Characterization of Non-culprit Vessels in Patients Undergoing Primary PCI for ST-elevation MI in Multivessel Disease

Anatomical, Physiological and Inflammatory Characterization of the Non-Culprit Vessels in Patients Undergoing Primary PCI for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the Presence of Multivessel Disease Toward a Personalised Approach to Complete Revascularisation After Primary PCI

• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: —
• Study type: Observational
• Enrollment: 320 (estimated)
• Sponsor: University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 85 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

Most heart attacks occur because a clot forms in a coronary artery blocking blood flow. Without blood heart muscle dies. Untreated, clots can cause a specific type of heart attack -ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). STEMI patients are treated immediately by finding the blocked artery ("culprit" lesion) using a dye injected into the coronary arteries and then by unblocking the artery using balloons and stents. This procedure - primary angioplasty - is offered 24/7 and limits the size of heart attacks and saves lives. Cardiologists know how to treat STEMI patients but it's less clear what to do about narrowings in other coronary arteries ("bystander" disease). This is important - if they're left alone some bystander lesions can cause future events including heart attacks or angina. Recent trials compared stenting ALL the bystander narrowings after primary angioplasty, with stenting none and showed some benefit from stenting all of them ("complete revascularisation"). However, complete revascularisation carries extra risk, putting patients through more complicated procedures and using up resource. A blanket strategy of complete revascularisation of ALL bystander narrowings in ALL STEMI patients is unlikely to be the correct answer as only a small minority of these patients have further events. In PICNIC the investigators want to identify bystander narrowings most likely to cause a future event, and those unlikely to do so. The study can then test the hypothesis that only the high-risk bystander narrowings need stenting, and the others can be treated with tablets only. Investigators will study patients using specialised imaging techniques from coronary artery CT scans and levels of inflammation to see which narrowings cause future events and which do not. If this can be done, a case can be made to test complete revascularisation only in bystander narrowings that look high risk.

Detailed description

Approximately 50% of patients presenting with an acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). Five randomized studies have shown that complete revascularization, either at the time of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) or within 45 days of the index admission, is safe and reduces the risk of repeat coronary revascularization and myocardial infarction (MI), particularly in the non-infarct related artery (NIRA). Despite these improvements in clinical outcomes, no study to date has provided a mechanistic insight as to how complete revascularization of chronic bystander disease may lead to the observed benefit. Indeed, the randomized studies, through the variable nature of their results (reduction in MI versus revascularization etc), have suggested the possibility that there are differing mechanisms for the observed benefit. The data would also be consistent with the concept that not all patients undergoing primary PCI with bystander disease require or benefit from complete revascularisation. This is an important possibility with important potential implications for resource utilisation and patient experience. The investigators hypothesize that the susceptibility of non-culprit disease to ischaemic events after primary PCI is variable between individuals, and possibly even between their coronary vessels and lesions. Specifically, the investigators postulate that this susceptibility may be related to multiple factors including their anatomical and physiological vulnerability, and their local vascular inflammatory status. In order to test this hypothesis, the investigators will systematically examine the following parameters in each bystander coronary vessel in patients who present with STEMI and are undergoing primary PCI of the culprit vessel: 1. markers of systemic inflammatory status 2. plaque anatomy including lesion severity and markers of lesion vulnerability on CTCA 3. assessment of individual coronary vessel inflammation using CT-derived fat attenuation index 4. vessel physiology using FFRCT (fractional flow reserve from computed tomography) incorporating wall shear stress and axial plaque stress. Aims The aims of this study are to address the following research questions: 1. What are the anatomical, physiological \& inflammatory features of lesions in the NIRA(s) of patients presenting with STEMI who are treated with a strategy of culprit-only PPCI? 2. Is there an association between these anatomical, physiological \& inflammatory features and the risk of non-culprit lesions causing adverse events in STEMI patients with significant bystander disease in the NIRA(s)?

Conditions

• ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DIAGNOSTIC_TEST	CT Coronary Angiography	CTCA for anatomical, physiological, plaque composition and inflammatory assessment of coronary arteries

Timeline

• Start date: 2025-01-20
• Primary completion: 2026-03-01
• Completion: 2029-01-01
• First posted: 2024-07-17
• Last updated: 2025-09-23

Locations

3 sites across 1 country: United Kingdom