Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT06405308
Robotic Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery Versus Robotic Transabdominal Specimen Extraction Surgery for Early-Stage Rectal Cancer
Robotic Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery Versus Robotic Transabdominal Specimen Extraction Surgery for Rectal Cancer: a Multicentre Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- —
- Study type
- Observational
- Enrollment
- 636 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Taiyuan Li · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 20 Years – 86 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
A retrospective cohort study, conducted nationwide(China) and across multiple centers, aimed to compare the surgical quality and short-term outcomes of R-NOSES (robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery)with R-TSES (robotic transabdominal specimen extraction surgery) for early-stage rectal cancer.
Detailed description
In this retrospective cohort study, data from 1086 patients who underwent R-NOSES or R-TSES for early-stage rectal cancer between October 2015 and November 2023 were collected from a prospectively maintained database of 8 experienced surgeons from 8 high-volume centers in china. The study was aimed to compare the surgical quality and short-term outcomes of R-NOSES with R-TSES for early-stage rectal cancer.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | R-NOSES group | robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery |
| PROCEDURE | R-TSES group | robotic transabdominal specimen extraction surgery |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2023-10-01
- Primary completion
- 2024-01-15
- Completion
- 2024-01-15
- First posted
- 2024-05-08
- Last updated
- 2024-05-13
Locations
8 sites across 1 country: China
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06405308. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.