Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT06306729

Computational Assessment of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Function

Comparing the In-vivo Haemodynamic and Biomechanical Performance of Rapid-deployment Edwards Intuity Elite System and Edwards Magna Ease Valve

Status
Unknown
Phase
Study type
Observational
Enrollment
20 (estimated)
Sponsor
Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Bioprosthetic valves are usually made of biological tissue that are mounted to a frame and are designed to function similarly to a healthy natural valve. Edwards Magna Ease and Intuity Elite bioprosthetic valves have similar leaflets and mounting designs. However, the valves are implanted in the patient in different ways (one is stitched to the wall of the left ventricular outflow tract, and the other is held in place by the radial force of the valve skirt). The study aims to understand in more detail how the different valves interact with the left ventricular outflow tract and aortic root.

Detailed description

The implantation of a bioprosthetic valve is the established surgical technique when replacing the aortic valve to treat various aortic valve diseases. Many different bioprosthetic valves are available. The design and implantation technique in each system would result in different interaction with the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) and the aortic root, leading to different flow profiles that may induce platelet aggregation and affect the long-term performance of the bioprosthesis and its durability. Additionally, complications such as valve thrombosis may occur. However, it is not currently clear which bioprostheses/patients are more prone to thrombosis or degradation of the valve. This study aims to develop fluid-structure interaction (FSI) models, which can model blood flow and wall/valve mechanics, using realistic patient-specific geometries and flow conditions which correlate with the true performance of the valve in the imaged patients, and to assess and compare such performances to understand the benefits and challenges with various bioprosthetic valves. FSI models combine computational fluid mechanics (CFD) with structural wall mechanics modelling. This is an alternative approach that allows detailed assessment of flow patterns and estimation of wall shear stress and pressure within blood vessels, and therefore has been applied increasingly to gain better insights into the hemodynamics in cardiovascular diseases

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTComputed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance ImagingComputed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Timeline

Start date
2024-04-01
Primary completion
2025-04-01
Completion
2026-04-01
First posted
2024-03-12
Last updated
2024-03-12

Regulatory

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06306729. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.