Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT06147492
Urinary Retention Following taTME VS laTME Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
Urinary Retention Following Transanal Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 526 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Yanhong Deng · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 65 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
A comprehensive study with prospectively collected data. These patients were assigned to either the taTME group or the laTME group according to the surgery procedure received
Detailed description
Transanal total mesorectal excision has emerged as a potential solution to certain limitations associated with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer patients. Differences in surgical approaches have raised questions regarding their impact on the risk of postoperative urinary retention, with limited data available from large scale study.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | transanal total mesorectal excision | a transanal bottom-up approach was employed for the TME procedure |
| PROCEDURE | Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision | Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2016-01-30
- Primary completion
- 2020-10-30
- Completion
- 2023-10-30
- First posted
- 2023-11-27
- Last updated
- 2023-11-27
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06147492. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.