Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT06083064

Protocol Based Selective Imaging Versus Routine Computed Tomography or Ultrasound in Suspected Appendicitis

Protocol Based Selective Imaging Versus Routine Computed Tomography or Ultrasound in Suspected Appendicitis (PROSECCO)

Status
Recruiting
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
900 (estimated)
Sponsor
Helsinki University Central Hospital · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare protocol based selective imaging to routine imaging in adult patients with suspected appendicitis. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are: * Does protocol based selective imaging using clinical scoring affect clinical outcome? * Does protocol based selective observation combined with score based selective imaging affect clinical outcome? Participants will be randomized into three groups: * Selective imaging based on Adult Appendicitis Score * Selective observation based on Appendicitis Severity Score combined with selective imaging based on Adult Appendicitis Score * Routine imaging using ultrasound and/or computed tomography Researchers will compare selective imaging groups separately with routine imaging to see if number of negative appendectomies or number of complicated appendicitis is not significantly increased.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTAbdominal imagingAbdominal ultrasound and/or abdominal CT
OTHERScore based selective abdominal imagingAbdominal imaging is done selectively based on Adult Appendicitis Score
OTHERScore based selective observation combined with selective abdominal imagingObservation based on Appendicitis Severity Score combined Adult Appendicitis Score based selective abdominal imaging

Timeline

Start date
2023-11-15
Primary completion
2026-12-31
Completion
2028-12-31
First posted
2023-10-13
Last updated
2025-03-12

Locations

3 sites across 1 country: Finland

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06083064. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.