Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Not Yet Recruiting

Not Yet RecruitingNCT06029699

High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Non Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in Reducing The Rate of Reintubation

High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Non Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in Reducing Reintubation in Mechanically Ventilated Patient

Status
Not Yet Recruiting
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50 (estimated)
Sponsor
Assiut University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

This is study aim to compare between high flow nasal canula (HFNC) and non invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in reducing the rate of reintubation in mechanically ventilated patient with successful weaning

Detailed description

* High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy comprises an air/oxygen blender, an active humidifier, a single heated circuit, and a nasal cannula. It delivers adequately heated and humidified medical gas at up to 60 L/min of flow and is considered to have a number of physiological effects: reduction of anatomical dead space, positive end expiratory pressure ( PEEP ) effect, constant fraction of inspired oxygen, and good humidification * Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation is a safe and effective means of improving gas exchange in patients with many types of acute respiratory failure . for example, adding noninvasive ventilation to standard therapy decreased the need for endotracheal intubation...For patients assigned to noninvasive ventilation, the ventilator was connected with conventional tubing to a clear, full-face mask with an inflatable soft-cushion seal and a disposable foam spacer to reduce dead space .After the mask had been secured, pressure support was increased to achieve an exhaled tidal volume of 8 to 10 ml per kilogram, a respiratory rate of fewer than 25 breaths per minute, the disappearance of accessory muscle activity (as evaluated by palpation of the sternocleidomastoid muscle), and patient comfort * The effects of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) on adult patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) are controversial. The investigators aimed to further determine the effectiveness of HFNC in reducing the rate of endotracheal intubation in adult patients with ARF by comparison to noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV)

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEhigh flow nasal cannuladevice are used for weaning patients after mechanical ventilation extubation
DEVICEnon invasive positive pressure ventilationdevice are used for weaning patients after mechanical ventilation extubation

Timeline

Start date
2023-10-01
Primary completion
2024-10-01
Completion
2026-10-01
First posted
2023-09-08
Last updated
2023-09-08

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06029699. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.