Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT05851781
Lacosamide Versus Propranolol in Migraine
Safety and Efficacy of Lacosamide Versus Propranolol in Migraine
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 600 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Kafrelsheikh University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 75 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Investigators aim to compare the effect of lacosamide versus propranolol in migraine by assessing the absolute reduction in MMD in each group, the percentage of patients who achieved ≥ 50% reduction in the monthly headache days frequency compared to the baseline frequency.
Detailed description
Investigators will enroll 600 migraine patients who are diagnosed according to ICHD3-beta criteria in our study and will use a questionnaire to detect their demographic and clinical features (disease duration, attack frequency, and duration, pain intensity assessed by the visual analogic scale and we have two groups the first group will include 300 patients and will receive 50 mg lacosamide twice daily, and the second group will receive propranolol 160 mg per day. Investigators will assess The number of migraine days after three months of treatment and the percentage of patients who achieved ≥ 50% reduction in the monthly headache days frequency compared to the baseline frequency (14). HIT-6 score reduction in each group after three months of treatment. The safety of lacosamide was evaluated by monitoring and documenting treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) in patients through regular follow-up procedures for three months.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Lacosamide tablet | The arm will include 300 migraine patients diagnosed according to ICHD3-beta criteria. We will assess The change in migraine days per 28 days, the number of migraine days after three months of treatment, and the percentage of patients who achieved ≥ 50% reduction in the monthly headache days frequency compared to the baseline frequency (14). HIT-6 score reduction in each group after three months of treatment. The safety of lacosamide was evaluated by monitoring and documenting treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) in patients through regular follow-up procedures for three months. |
| DRUG | Propranolol | The arm will include 300 migraine patients diagnosed according to ICHD3-beta criteria. We will assess The change in migraine days per 28 days, the number of migraine days after three months of treatment, and the percentage of patients who achieved ≥ 50% reduction in the monthly headache days frequency compared to the baseline frequency (14). HIT-6 score reduction in each group after three months of treatment. The safety of lacosamide was evaluated by monitoring and documenting treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) in patients through regular follow-up procedures for three months. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2022-06-01
- Primary completion
- 2023-07-30
- Completion
- 2023-08-30
- First posted
- 2023-05-10
- Last updated
- 2024-05-01
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Egypt
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05851781. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.