Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT05715788
Prone Positioning vs. Prone Positioning and NO Inhalation in COVID-19 ARDS.
Prone Positioning Versus Prone Positioning and NO Inhalation in COVID-19 Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- —
- Study type
- Observational
- Enrollment
- 30 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The investigators aim to investigate the effects of prone positioning and prone positioning with NO inhalation for COVID-19 patients with ARDS.
Detailed description
The investigators aim to investigate the effects of prone positioning and prone positioning with NO inhalation for COVID-19 patients with ARDS. Patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS were ventilated in prone position with or without NO inhalation, the arterial blood gas (ABG) tests were performed at 16 hours after prone positioning.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Nitric oxide | Nitric oxide inhalation at 20 ppm |
| BEHAVIORAL | prone positioning | vatilation in prone position |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2022-12-21
- Primary completion
- 2023-12-01
- Completion
- 2023-12-01
- First posted
- 2023-02-08
- Last updated
- 2023-02-08
Locations
1 site across 1 country: China
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05715788. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.