Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT05537974
Open Suction vs. Closed Suction in ARDS
Effect of Endotracheal Aspiration on End-expiratory Lung Volume in Patients With ARDS, Comparison of Open vs. Closed Suction, A Randomize Cross-over Study
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 20 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Izmir Dr Suat Seren Chest Diseases and Surgery Education and Research Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The alveoli tend to collapse in patients with ARDS. Endotracheal aspiration may increase alveolar collapse by decreasing the end-expiratory lung volume. The hypothesis is that closed endotracheal aspiration led to less end-expiratory volume loss when compared to open endotracheal aspiration.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Endotracheal aspiration | Clearance of endotracheal secretions via a catheter. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2022-09-15
- Primary completion
- 2022-10-31
- Completion
- 2022-10-31
- First posted
- 2022-09-13
- Last updated
- 2023-01-18
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05537974. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.