Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT05497986
Conventional Low Flow Oxygenation Versus High Flow Nasal Cannula in Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 84 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Hôpital de Verdun · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Current evidence suggests a mechanistic and physiological rationale for the use of high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in acute respiratory hypoxemic failure (AHRF) based on physiological studies in airway models, healthy volunteers and patients with Chronic Obstructive Respiratory Disease (COPD). This is supported by observational studies in patients with AHRF with reductions in a range of respiratory and other physiological parameters. Observational studies also suggest similar intubation rates and lower failure rates with HFNC when compared to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) with improved patient acceptance and tolerance for HFNC. The role of HFNC is less clear in acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. Although non-invasive ventilation is the recommended treatment, it is associated with discomfort, and a significant proportion (up to 25% in some reports) cannot tolerate non-invasive ventilation. Observational reports and limited data from randomized controlled trials suggests that HFNC is effective in treating patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure. We designed this trial to assess whether early application of HFNC in patients with non-severe hypercapnic respiratory failure can correct barometric abnormalities, and prevent progression to non-invasive ventilation or tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | High flow nasal cannula | HFNC with the maximum tolerated flow (up to 60 L/min). Titration of supplemental oxygen to a SpO2 between 88 - 92%. |
| DEVICE | Conventional low flow oxygenation | Conventional oxygenation through nasal prongs or a facemask, with supplemental oxygen titrated to a SpO2 between 88 - 92%. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2022-10-01
- Primary completion
- 2024-01-01
- Completion
- 2024-07-01
- First posted
- 2022-08-11
- Last updated
- 2022-08-11
Locations
3 sites across 1 country: Canada
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05497986. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.