Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT05491278
Efficacy and Safety of Fospropofol Disodium Versus Propofol for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 60 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Xiaobo Yang, MD · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 75 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fospropofol disodium for injection compared to propofol for sedation in mechanically ventilated ICU patients.
Detailed description
This is a randomized, open-label, small sample study using fospropofol disodium and propofol for sedation in mechanically ventilated ICU patients. Subjects are randomized to different treatment groups (including 1 for fospropofol disodium and 1 for propofol). Remifentanil is co-administered with fospropofol or propofol. Efficacy and safety profiles of fospropofol disodium are to be evaluated.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Fospropofol disodium for injection | Fospropofol disodium for injection continuous infusion to reach a RASS score of -3 to 0. Remifentanil continuous infusion of 4 to 9 ug/kg/h for. The dosage adjustment plan was determined by the attending physician. Whether to use other sedative drugs is up to the attending physician. |
| DRUG | Propofol | Propofol for injection continuous infusion to reach a RASS score of -3 to 0. Remifentanil continuous infusion of 4 to 9 ug/kg/h for. The dosage adjustment plan was determined by the attending physician. Whether to use other sedative drugs is up to the attending physician. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2022-08-10
- Primary completion
- 2023-06-15
- Completion
- 2023-09-10
- First posted
- 2022-08-08
- Last updated
- 2023-09-21
Locations
1 site across 1 country: China
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05491278. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.