NCT05458583

The Periodontal Status and Failure Rates With Different Retainer Bonding Techniques Using One-step Adhesive

Comparison of Periodontal Status and Failure Rates With Different Retainer Bonding Methods and Adhesives: A Randomized Clinical Trial

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 100 (actual)
• Sponsor: Pamukkale University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: —
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

The aim of this study was to evaluate fixed retainers, bonded with either direct or indirect techniques using one- or two-step adhesives, in terms of periodontal status and failure rates.

Conditions

• Periodontal Inflammation

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Baseline periodontal measurements (T0)	Periodontal measurements including plaque index, gingival index and calculus index were recorded at the bonding session.
PROCEDURE	Periodontal measurements (T1)	Periodontal measurements including plaque index, gingival index and calculus index were recorded at the 6 months after bonding.
PROCEDURE	Periodontal measurements (T2)	Periodontal measurements including plaque index, gingival index and calculus index were recorded at the 12 months after bonding.
PROCEDURE	Retainer failure rates	A retainer with at least one composite pad detachment was considered to be a failure during 1-year follow-up.

Timeline

• Start date: 2021-02-03
• Primary completion: 2021-03-04
• Completion: 2022-03-01
• First posted: 2022-07-14
• Last updated: 2022-07-26

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)