Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT05431595

Managing Agitated Delirium With Neuroleptics and Anti-Epileptics as a Neuroleptic Sparing Strategy

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
42 (estimated)
Sponsor
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

To examine the effects of haloperidol, chlorpromazine, valproic acid and placebo, in conjunction with standardized non-pharmacologic interventions, in the first line treatment of agitated delirium in hospitalized patients with cancer. This double-blind, randomized clinical trial aims to provide evidence on various therapeutic options for palliating delirium, thereby reducing delirium-related distress and ultimately alleviating suffering.

Detailed description

Objectives: Primary objective: Compare the effect of scheduled haloperidol, chlorpromazine, valproate and placebo (non-pharmacological interventions alone) on the frequency of breakthrough restlessness over 72 hours in patients with agitated delirium seen by the palliative care consultation team. Our working hypothesis is that haloperidol, chlorpromazine, and valproate will lead to fewer episodes of breakthrough restlessness than placebo. Secondary Objective #1: Compare the effects of scheduled haloperidol, chlorpromazine, valproate and placebo on (1) RASS-PAL, (2) need for dose escalation, (3) perceived comfort by caregivers and bedside nurses, (4) delirium severity (Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale), (5) delirium-related distress in caregivers and nurses (Delirium Experience Questionnaire), (6) delirium recall in patients (Delirium Recall Questionnaire), (7) symptom expression (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale), (8) adverse effects, and (9) survival. Our working hypothesis is that haloperidol, chlorpromazine, and valproate are superior to placebo (non-pharmacologic interventions alone) in improving delirium-related outcomes. Secondary Objective #2: Estimate the efficacy of non-pharmacologic interventions alone on breakthrough restlessness. Our working hypothesis is that patients in the placebo group will require fewer breakthrough doses in the 72 hours after implementation of non-pharmacological interventions

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGHaloperidolGiven by Vein (IV)
DRUGChlorpromazineGiven by Vein (IV)
DRUGValproateGiven by Vein (IV)
DRUGPlaceboGiven by Vein (IV)

Timeline

Start date
2022-07-19
Primary completion
2027-02-02
Completion
2027-02-02
First posted
2022-06-24
Last updated
2025-11-18

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Regulatory

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05431595. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.