Trials / Recruiting
RecruitingNCT05387954
PFO Closure, Oral Anticoagulants or Antiplatelet Therapy After PFO-associated Stroke in Patients Aged 60 to 80 Years
Transcatheter Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) Closure, Oral Anticoagulants or Antiplatelet Therapy After PFO-associated Stroke in Patients Between 60 and 80 Years Old : a Randomised Controlled Trial.
- Status
- Recruiting
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 792 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 60 Years – 80 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
To assess whether PFO closure plus antiplatelet therapy is superior to antiplatelet therapy alone and whether oral anticoagulant therapy is superior to antiplatelet therapy to prevent stroke recurrence in patients aged 60 to 80 years with a PFO with large shunt (\> 20 microbubbles) or a PFO associated with an ASA (\> 10 mm), and an otherwise unexplained ischemic stroke.
Detailed description
The CLOSE trial (NCT00562289, NEJM 2017) has unambiguously demonstrated the superiority of patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure over antiplatelet therapy alone in patients aged up to 60 years with a PFO associated with an atrial septal aneurysm (ASA) or a large right-to-left shunt (so-called "high-risk PFO"), and an otherwise unexplained ischemic stroke. Oral anticoagulant therapy is also a logical approach assuming that PFO-related strokes are due to paradoxical embolism which implies a venous source of embolism, or to direct embolization of a thrombus formed at the atrial level. The CLOSE trial also suggested that oral anticoagulants might reduce stroke recurrence compared to aspirin. There is accumulating evidence that presence of a PFO is significantly associated with cryptogenic stroke in patients over 60 years. Cryptogenic ischemic strokes represent about one third of all ischemic strokes in patients older than 60 years. However, the optimal therapeutic strategy in patients older than 60 years with a PFO and an otherwise unexplained ischemic stroke is unknown, because these patients were excluded from randomized trials. The hypothesis tested in this trial is that transcatheter PFO closure plus long-term antiplatelet therapy is superior to antiplatelet therapy alone and that oral anticoagulant therapy is superior to antiplatelet therapy to prevent recurrent stroke in patients aged 60 to 80 years who have a high-risk PFO and a recent otherwise unexplained ischemic stroke.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Transcatheter PFO closure | PFO closure followed by dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin 75 mg/d + clopidogrel 75 mg/d) for 3 months, then by single antiplatelet therapy by aspirin or clopidogrel until the end of the study. |
| DRUG | Oral Anticoagulant, Direct-Acting | Apixaban (5mg twice a day) OR Dabigatran (150 mg twice a day) OR Rivaroxaban (20 mg once a day) |
| DRUG | Antiplatelet therapy | Patients randomized to this arm will receive antiplatelet therapy throughout the study : aspirin 75 mg/d + clopidogrel 75 mg/d) for 3 months, then single antiplatelet therapy by aspirin or clopidogrel |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2023-07-07
- Primary completion
- 2031-07-07
- Completion
- 2031-07-07
- First posted
- 2022-05-24
- Last updated
- 2026-03-24
Locations
42 sites across 1 country: France
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05387954. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.