Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT05320718

Analgesia in Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Programmed Intermittent Bolus Infusions of Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Paravertebral Block

Comparison of Programmed Intermittent Bolus Infusions of Spinae Plane Block Versus Paravertebral Block for Analgesia in Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
140 (actual)
Sponsor
Peking University Third Hospital · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Paravertebral block (PVB) has been regarded as effective regimen for pain control after cardiac surgery. As a novel analgesia technique, erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been reported to provide effective analgesia after thoracic and cardiac surgery. We hypothesized that the ESPB is non-inferior to PVB in treating pain in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery.

Detailed description

Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting has recently gained with popularity in treatment of coronary artery disease. Compared with conventional approach, it has advantages of less trauma and rapid recovery, but postoperative pain is severe, which may increase the risk of cardiopulmonary complications and cause chronic pain. Therefore, perioperative analgesia is crucial in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. Paravertebral block (PVB) has been regarded as effective regimen for pain control after cardiac surgery. As a novel analgesia technique, erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been reported to provide effective analgesia after thoracic and cardiac surgery. We hypothesized that the ESPB is non-inferior to PVB in treating pain in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGRopivacaine20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine as bolus and a programmed intermittent bolus of 10 ml ropivacaine 0.2% every 2 h after surgery

Timeline

Start date
2022-03-01
Primary completion
2023-06-30
Completion
2023-12-30
First posted
2022-04-11
Last updated
2025-01-08

Locations

2 sites across 1 country: China

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05320718. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.