Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT05294315

Bi-level vs. Single Level ESB in VATS

The Analgesic Efficacy of Bi-level Versus Single Level Erector Spinae Block in Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: a Randomized Patient Blinded Study

Status
Unknown
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90 (estimated)
Sponsor
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is a minimally invasive surgery to remove lesions from the thoracic cavity. It is associated with moderate pain which can lead to pulmonary complications after surgery. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons recommended a multimodal analgesia approach to manage pain after VATS. Erector spinae block (ESB) is a popular analgesic block due to its ease of performance and wide coverage. It has been shown to be effective in randomized control trials. Recently, case reports on bi-level ESB are emerging, suggesting more effective analgesia compared to single level ESB. As there is no available data, the investigators are interested in conducting a randomized pilot study, comparing bi-level to single level ESB to gather baseline data for sample size calculation for a formal randomized trial.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREBi-level erector spinae blockerector spinae block at 4th and 6th transverse process
PROCEDURESingle level erector spinae blockerector spinae block at 4th transverse process

Timeline

Start date
2022-06-01
Primary completion
2023-01-01
Completion
2023-02-01
First posted
2022-03-24
Last updated
2022-03-24

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Canada

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05294315. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.