Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT05181371

ESP Block in VATS: Programmed Intermittent Bolus Versus Continuous Infusion on Quality of Recovery

Ultrasound Guided, Continuous Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block in Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery: Comparing Programmed Intermittent Bolus (PIB) vs Continuous Infusion on Quality of Recovery and Postoperative Respiratory Function

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60 (actual)
Sponsor
Mater Misericordiae University Hospital · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Fascial plane blocks, such as ESP, rely on the spread of local anaesthetic on an interfacial plane, automated boluses may be particularly useful for this group of blocks. However, until recently, ambulatory pumps capable of providing automated boluses in addition to patient-controlled boluses were not widely available. To best of our knowledge, there are no randomised controlled trials comparing continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus strategies for Erector Spinae Plane Block for MITS in terms of patient centred outcomes such as quality of recovery.

Detailed description

Minimally invasive thoracic surgery (MITS) has been shown to reduce postoperative pain, reduce tissue trauma and contribute to better recovery as compared to open thoracotomy. However, it still causes significant acute post-operative pain. Our Mater research group has shown that fascial plane blocks such as the Erector Spinae Plane block (ESP) contribute to post-operative analgesia after MITS. Case reports have described the improved quality of analgesia following ESP using programmed intermittent boluses (PIB) instead of continuous infusion. It is hypothesised that larger, repeated bolus doses provide superior analgesia, possibly as a result of improved spread of the local anaesthetic. Evidence for improved spread of local anaesthetic may be found in one study which demonstrated that PIB increased the number of affected dermatomal levels compared to continuous infusions for continuous paravertebral blocks. Similarly, with regard to labour epidural analgesia, PIB provides better analgesia compared with continuous infusion. Because fascial plane blocks, such as ESP, rely on the spread of local anaesthetic on an interfacial plane, automated boluses may be particularly useful for this group of blocks. However, until recently, ambulatory pumps capable of providing automated boluses in addition to patient-controlled boluses were not widely available. To the best of our knowledge, there are no randomised controlled trials comparing continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus strategies for Erector Spinae Plane Block for MITS in terms of patient-centered outcomes such as quality of recovery.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREUltrasound Guided ESP Block with Programmed Intermittent Bolus (PIB) for VATSProgrammed Intermittent Bolus (PIB) of Levobupivacaine
PROCEDUREUltrasound Guided ESP Block with Continuous Infusion (CI) for VATSContinuous Infusion (CI) of Levobupivacaine

Timeline

Start date
2022-06-02
Primary completion
2023-08-01
Completion
2023-08-01
First posted
2022-01-06
Last updated
2023-09-21

Locations

2 sites across 1 country: Ireland

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05181371. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.