Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT05163665

Cost-effective Analysis of Two Approximation Devices in Closure of Gastrointestinal Defects

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
82 (actual)
Sponsor
Baylor College of Medicine · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

This is a prospective, randomized research trial that aims to evaluate the clinical results of two different approximation methods to close the tissue defect caused by removing gastrointestinal polyps.

Detailed description

Closure of GI defects after endoscopic resection decreases the rate of post resection bleeding. Traditionally, standard TTS clips have been used to close GI wall defects with some success. However, complete apposition of the resection wall edges occurs only 68% of the time. Endoscopic suturing with the traditional Overstitch device can achieve complete closure in almost 100% of defects. However, this device is costly, requires the use of a double channel therapeutic endoscope, and at times can be difficult to maneuver. Recently, a novel FDA approved TTS tissue helix and suture device (X-tack) was developed to overcome the challenges of the traditional Overstitch device. Animal models have demonstrated the X-tack system is superior to TTS in effecting large mucosal defects and maintain similar durability. At BCM, we have been using the X-tack system routinely in closure of GI defects.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREClosure typePatients will have their endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) as per standard-of-care. Afterwards, patient will receive one of two intervention options for the closure of the GI defect following polyp removal.

Timeline

Start date
2022-08-23
Primary completion
2023-08-15
Completion
2023-09-11
First posted
2021-12-20
Last updated
2024-02-15

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05163665. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.