Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT05016310

A Study of High-Dose Vit D Versus Standard of Care Vit D Supplementation

A Randomized, Open-label Study of High-Dose Vitamin D Versus Standard of Care Vitamin D Supplementation to Evaluate the Impact on Bone Health in Young Women With Early Stage Breast Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
7 (actual)
Sponsor
Wake Forest University Health Sciences · Academic / Other
Sex
Female
Age
18 Years – 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

This is a randomized study evaluating the effects of early intensive vitamin D supplementation compared to standard of care vitamin D supplementation on bone health over an 18 month period.

Detailed description

This is a randomized, open-label study designed to evaluate the effect of high dose vitamin D versus standard of care vitamin D supplementation on bone health and arthralgias. The randomization will be stratified by hormone receptor status (positive versus negative). The primary objective is to compare the effect of high dose vitamin D to the current standard vitamin D treatment administration algorithm on bone health, as measured by percent change from baseline in bone mineral density (g/cm2), in young women with non-metastatic breast cancer who receive systemic therapy.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTHigh Dose Vitamin DHigh dose vitamin D: Subjects will receive 50,000 IU vitamin D2 weekly x 16 weeks followed by 4,000 IU of vitamin D3 daily with a goal 25(OH)D level of ≥45 but ≤80 ng/mL.
DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTStandard of Care Vitamin DStandard of Care Vitamin D: Vitamin D will be supplemented to 25(OH)D levels, with a goal 25(OH)D level of \>30 ng/mL according to Endocrine Society Practice Guidelines.

Timeline

Start date
2021-09-16
Primary completion
2024-02-21
Completion
2024-08-15
First posted
2021-08-23
Last updated
2025-07-23

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT05016310. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.