NCT04968886

TuBerculosis Viability Interregional Study and Agreement on Biological Tests

Multicenter Prospective Evaluation of Rapid Viability Tests for Mycobacterium Tuberculosis to Improve the Follow-up of Tuberculosis Patients and Guide Isolation Measures

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: —
• Study type: Observational
• Enrollment: 104 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The objective of the present study is to confirm in a multicentric study the utility of our viability test in large cohort of smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients under treatment and to determine if the test could help physicians to discontinue isolation measures in hospital setting.

Detailed description

When patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) are hospitalized for diagnosis and treatment, isolation measures are mandatory in order to prevent transmission. Recommendations are to maintain isolation until patients are no more infectious, which is ascertained when cultures of respiratory specimens become negative (culture conversion). After administration of antibiotics, the average time to culture conversion is one month for patients with drug-susceptible TB, but 5%-30% cases require more than two months and up to 6 months can be required for multiresistant (MDR)-TB. Microscopic examination of bacilli in respiratory samples is mainly used as a surrogate marker but because bacilli staining does not differentiate alive from dead bacilli, the interpretation of positive smears is misleading. After 1-2 months of treatment, bacilli can be considered dead while they are still alive and isolation measures are thus erroneously discontinued. Conversely, bacilli can be considered viable while they have already been killed by the treatment and patients kept inadequately in isolation. To overcome the misleading results, attempts have been made to develop viability biomarkers for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), the agent of tuberculosis. Studies using RNA or DNA gave convincing results but their cost is not affordable in most part of the world. Those using fluorescein probes are easiest but studies have shown either conflicting results, or have been evaluated only for a short period of time after initiation of therapy. Thus, we evaluated a fluorescent staining able to differentiate dead bacilli from alive, which was previously used for detection of industrial environmental pathogens - the Live/Dead® BacLight™ Bacterial viability test (Invitrogen, Biocentric, France). Briefly, the test permits to visualize the bacteria using SYTO-9 and propidiumiodide (PI) fluorescent dyes, which both bind to DNA but penetrate specifically cytoplasmic membrane: SYTO-9 penetrates all bacilli, either viable or not, whereas the PI penetrates only in cells with damaged membrane. Consequently, the viable bacteria are impermeable to PI and only fluoresced due to SYTO-9 appearing green under the fluorescent microscope, whereas dead bacteria are marked by both fluorescent dyes and appear red. We firstly adapted the kit to mycobacteriology and assessed, in in vitro experiments, the concordance of the test with the culture results. Then, we showed in an observational prospective study its accurateness to predict culture results in patients undergoing antituberculous therapy: the viability test correctly predicted all culture-positive samples in the first two months after treatment. The objective of the present study is to confirm in a multicentric study the utility of our viability test in large cohort of smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients under treatment and to determine if the test could help physicians to discontinue isolation measures in hospital setting. Since the test is quick (less than 1 h for the test versus a median of 23 days for culture) and easy to perform, it would be useful to help physicians to maintain isolation in clinical settings while avoiding unnecessary cultures. Since the test is also cheap (\<1 € for reagents) this issue could be particularly valuable in countries with limited resources and where cultures are unavailable.

Conditions

• Tuberculosis, Pulmonary

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DIAGNOSTIC_TEST	Diagnostic Test: viability test on sputum and comparision with culture results (reference test)	Diagnostic Test: viability test on sputum and comparision with culture results (reference test)

Timeline

• Start date: 2022-09-01
• Primary completion: 2023-12-01
• Completion: 2023-12-01
• First posted: 2021-07-20
• Last updated: 2022-06-28