Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT04953728

Optimization of Transcutaneous Electrical Acustimulation (TEA) Modalities for Treatment of IBS-C

TEA for Study Participants With IBS-C Optimization of TEA Modalities for Treatment of IBS-C: A Phase 1 25 Study Participant Clinical Trial of Transcutaneous Electrical Acustimulation (TEA) in Study Participants With IBS-C

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
23 (actual)
Sponsor
University of Michigan · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

This study aims to determine the most effective treatment with Transcutaneous Electrical Acustimulation (TEA) for Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Constipation (IBS-C) by comparing efficacy between 5 separate sessions. The rectum pressure as measured by a device called a barostat will be compared between visits. Each session will be testing a different combination of frequency and body position of the electrodes. Electrodes placed at either the wrist or knee will be stimulated at either 25 Hz or 100 Hz.

Detailed description

This study aims to discern whether acute, single-session Transcutaneous Electrical Acustimulation (TEA) at acupuncture points ST36 or PC6 will relieve abdominal pain induced by rectal distension in patients with IBS-C. Each study participant will have 5 research visits at the Michigan Medicine GI physiology lab. During these visits, participants will undergo a procedure similar to Anal Rectal Manometry (ARM) performed by the GI physiology lab staff. TEA is similar to this procedure as it uses the barostat device and is performed by the GI physiology lab staff. This device has a rubber catheter that will be inserted 5-15 cm into the rectum of the study participant. Then the GI physiology staff will inflate the catheter. Study participants will then be asked when they can sense the catheter. Then the GI physiology staff will continue to inflate the catheter and the study participants feel discomfort (described as the 'urge to defecate'). Then the study participant will be asked to pass the balloon (like they would pass a bowel movement). The difference between ARM procedure and the study procedure is that there will be stimulation of acupuncture point ST36 which is below the knee cap or stimulation of acupuncture point PC6 which is just above the wrist. For this study, this mild electrical stimulation will occur simultaneously with the barostat procedure. At each visit there will be stimulation of only one of the points at either 100Hz or 25Hz. These are the potential combinations: ST36 100Hz, ST36-25Hz, PC6-100Hz, PC6-25Hz, Sham-TEA. The frequency and position combination (or sham visit) is randomly assigned. The randomization determines the order in which the study participant moves through the study. Every study participant will, in the end, complete one visit at each frequency and a sham visit. The study participant will also complete surveys at the appointment. The TEA device is classified by the FDA as a non-significant risk device.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICETranscutaneous Electrical Acustimulation (TEA)Each participant will undergo 5 sessions total at two different frequencies (25 Hz and 100Hz) with electrodes placed at two different locations (wrist and knee) and a placebo session.

Timeline

Start date
2021-07-01
Primary completion
2022-12-05
Completion
2022-12-05
First posted
2021-07-08
Last updated
2024-02-16
Results posted
2024-02-16

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Regulatory

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04953728. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.