NCT04826783

Use of Various Laser Systems in Peri-implatit

Effect of Various Laser Systems in Smokers and Nonsmokers With Peri-implantitis: A Randomized, Prospective, Single-Blind Clinical Trial

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 50 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Kırıkkale University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 30 Years – 60 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

Objectives: In recent years, a new field of work has been created with the use of laser beam to provide titanium surface decontamination. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of various laser systems in smokers and non-smokers with peri-implantitis. Materials and Methods: According to the study protocol, patients, who were diagnosed with peri-implantitis based on the clinical and radiographic evaluations, were divided into six groups: Group 1: smokers undergoing diode laser application; Group 2: smokers undergoing Erbium, chromium: yttrium, scandium, gallium, garnet (Er, Cr:YSGG) laser application; Group 3: smokers undergoing Erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser application; Group 4: non-smokers undergoing diode laser application; Group 5: non-smokers undergoing Er, Cr:YSGG laser application; and Group 6: non-smokers undergoing Er:YAG laser application. Peri-implant sulcus depth (SD), clinical attachment level (CAL), suppuration, modified plaque index (mPI), gingival index (GI), and modified sulcus bleeding index (mSBI) were recorded and peri-implant sulcus fluid (PISF) was collected to evaluate osteocalcin.

Conditions

• Peri-Implantitis

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DEVICE	Lasers	The laser tip was applied as vertical and horizontal scan along the subgingival implant . The procedure was carried out on day zero, seven and 14.

Timeline

• Start date: 2021-04-25
• Primary completion: 2021-10-25
• Completion: 2022-04-25
• First posted: 2021-04-01
• Last updated: 2021-04-01

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)