Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT04787861
Motorized Movement Therapy & Pulmonary Functions in Down Syndrome
Improved Pulmonary Functions and Exercise Capacity in Children With Down Syndrome Following Motorized Movement Therapy: Comparison With Chest Physical Therapy
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 40 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Taibah University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 9 Years – 13 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
To investigate the effects of the addition of motorized movement therapy versus conventional chest physiotherapy alone on pulmonary functions, exercise capacity, and endurance in children with Down Syndrome
Detailed description
To investigate the effects of the addition of motorized movement therapy versus conventional chest physiotherapy alone on pulmonary functions, exercise capacity, and endurance in children with Down Syndrome (DS). Methods: This randomized controlled study included 40 children (24 boys \& 16 girls) with DS. Their ages ranged from 9 to 13 years. The control group received conventional chest physical therapy program, three sessions per week for 12 weeks. The study group received an aerobic exercise regimen using a motorized movement therapy device 3 times /week in addition to the same traditional program used with the control group. Pulmonary function tests, and six-minutes walking test were measured at baseline, after 18 sessions and after 36 sessions of treatment.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OTHER | motorized movement therapy | The study group received an aerobic exercise regimen using a motorized movement therapy device 3 times /week in addition to the same traditional program used with the control group. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2018-12-17
- Primary completion
- 2020-03-07
- Completion
- 2020-05-04
- First posted
- 2021-03-09
- Last updated
- 2021-03-09
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Saudi Arabia
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04787861. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.