Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT04692311

Pilot Study Concerning an Intelligent Activity-based Client-centred Training System in Neurorehabilitation

Motivation, Usability and Functionality of an Intelligent Activity-based Client-centred Training System in Neurological Rehabilitation: a Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25 (actual)
Sponsor
PXL University College · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The pilot study was performed to evaluate the usability, credibility and expectancy of an intelligent, activity-based client-centred training system (i-ACT), and the motivation towards its use in neurological rehabilitation over a short period of time.

Detailed description

A mixed-method study was performed in four rehabilitation centres in Belgium. An homogenous convenience sample was recruited among persons with central nervous system disorders. Participants received 3 x 45 minutes of training with the i-ACT system during six weeks, additional to conventional care. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) was used to collect and evaluate patients' individual goals towards rehabilitation. These goals were discussed with the therapists before implementing movements and exercises for each patient in the i-ACT system. The following demographic data were obtained from the medical files: age, gender, and diagnosis. Outcomes measures were collected at baseline (T0), after 2 (T1), 4 (T2) and 6 (T3) weeks of training and at 9 weeks follow-up (T4). The primary outcome measures were the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI), the System Usability Scale (SUS), Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ), the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), and Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT). The secondary measures were the Manual Ability Measure-36 (MAM-36), Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS), and Active Range of Motion (AROM). After final training with i-ACT, a semi-structured interview was performed to gather more information about the participants' perception towards i-ACT. For quantitative data, within-group differences of all the assessments were analysed using Friedman's ANOVA and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Alpha was set at 0.05; No Bonferroni correction was applied as it is not compulsory in an exploratory study and furthermore, results are regarded as hypothesis for further investigations. The qualitative data was collected and recorded with a voice recorder. No specific analysis was used as the interview collected data to support or oppose the findings of the quantitative data.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEan intelligent client-centred task-oriented training3 x 45min of training with i-ACT system
OTHERSemi-structured interviewParticipants, patients and therapists, were invited to a semi-structured interview after training period.

Timeline

Start date
2016-01-04
Primary completion
2016-08-31
Completion
2016-08-31
First posted
2020-12-31
Last updated
2020-12-31

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04692311. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.