NCT04586738

Efficacy and Safety of Non-resorbable Uveoscleral Implant Versus Absorbable Collagen Matrix in Non-perforating Deep Sclerectomy

Comparative Clinical Trial on the Efficacy and Safety of Non-resorbable Uveoscleral Implant Associated With Absorbable Collagen Matrix vs Isolated Absorbable Collagen Matrix in Non-perforating Deep Sclerectomy in Glaucoma Surgery

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 120 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate and compare the hypotensive efficacy at 24 months between non-perforating deep sclerectomy surgery with non-resorbable uveoscleral implant associated with absorbable collagen matrix versus non-perforating deep sclerectomy surgery with isolated absorbable collagen matrix implant.

Detailed description

The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the hypotensive efficacy at 24 months between two implants in glaucoma surgery. Non-perforating deep sclerectomy surgery with non-resorbable uveoscleral implant associated with absorbable collagen matrix versus non-perforating deep sclerectomy surgery with isolated absorbable collagen matrix implant.

Conditions

• Glaucoma

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	non-perforating deep sclerectomy surgery	Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy is a non-perforating filtration procedure used for the surgical treatment of medically uncontrolled open angle glaucoma.This surgery is performed to facilitate the outflow of aqueous humour from the anterior chamber to the subconjunctival space through a natural membrane (trabeculo-Descemet's window). This enables a more physiological reduction of intraocular pressure to be achieved.

Timeline

• Start date: 2020-09-01
• Primary completion: 2021-11-01
• Completion: 2021-12-01
• First posted: 2020-10-14
• Last updated: 2021-02-18

Locations

2 sites across 1 country: Spain