NCT04525820

High Dose Vitamin-D Substitution in Patients With COVID-19: a Randomized Controlled, Multi Center Study

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 80 (actual)
• Sponsor: Prof. Dr. Jörg Leuppi · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The world is currently facing a pandemic with the coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) which leads to the disease of COVID-19. Risk factors for a poor outcome of COVID-19 have so far been identified as older age and co-morbidity including chronic respiratory conditions such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and current smoking status. Previous studies found, that vitamin D deficiency is more prevalent among patients with these risk factors. There are observational studies reporting independent associations between low serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (the major circulating vitamin D metabolite) and susceptibility to acute respiratory tract infection. Vitamin D substitution in patients with COVID-19 who show a vitamin D deficiency should therefore be investigated for efficacy and safety. The study is designed as a randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind study. The objective of the study is to test the hypothesis that patients with vitamin D deficiency suffering from COVID-19 treated under standardized conditions in hospital will recover faster when additionally treated with a single high dose of vitamin D compared to standard treatment only.

Detailed description

The world is currently experiencing a coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. The disease caused by infection with this virus is known as COVID-19. Risk factors for a poor outcome of COVID-19 have so far been found to include, older age and co-morbidity including chronic respiratory conditions and current smoking status. Previous studies found, that vitamin D deficiency is more prevalent among patients with these risk factors. There are observational studies reporting independent associations between low serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (the major circulating vitamin D metabolite) and susceptibility to acute respiratory tract infection. 25-hydroxyvitamin D supports induction of antimicrobial peptides in response to both viral and bacterial stimuli suggesting a potential mechanism by which vitamin D inducible protection against respiratory pathogens might be mediated. The clear functions of vitamin D in the immune system are difficult to define because the immune response is not a static process. The vitamin-D-receptor, which has also been detected in immunological cells, suggests that vitamin D can regulate some processes related to immunity. A further argument which supports a potential antiviral activity of vitamin D is the modulation of the inflammatory response. The release of pro-inflammatory cytokines by the influenza virus appeared to correlate with the severity of illness. The use of vitamin D as a prophylactic for influenza has shown promise in prevention of illness and reduction of secondary asthma in children. Inadequate vitamin D status is associated with susceptibility to upper respiratory infections in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In the ViDiCo-trial vitamin D supplementation protected against moderate or severe exacerbation, but not upper respiratory infection, in patients with COPD. A further study retrospectively examined data from 108 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) for whom a vitamin D status was available at the time of diagnosis revealed that over 95% of these patients had vitamin D deficiency. When examined according to quarterly of serum 25- hydroxyvitamin D, a consistent inverse relationship between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and length of hospital and ICU stay among survivors was observed. Vitamin D substitution in patients with COVID-19 who show a vitamin D deficiency should therefore be investigated for efficacy and safety. For this purpose the investigators designed a randomized, placebo controlled double blind trial to test the hypothesis hypothesis that a single high dose of vitamin D in addition to standard treatment improves the recovery period positively in patients with COVID-19 and vitamin D deficiency compared to standard treatment only. That means, that the time of recovery is shorter in the single high dose vitamin D group relative to standard treatment group only.

Conditions

• Covid19
• Vitamin D Deficiency
• Corona Virus Infection
• ARDS
• Coronavirus
• SARS-CoV Infection

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DRUG	Single high dose vitamin D	Patient receives either one dose orally of 140'000 IU (7 ml) of this drug once as an intervention treatment additionally to TAU or the patient receives 7 ml of the placebo Solution (7 ml) in addition to TAU
DRUG	Placebo	Patient receives a single dose of a placebo solution
DRUG	Treatment as usual vitamin D	Both groups receive the treatment as usual after the single high dose or the placebo which will be 800 IU per day

Timeline

• Start date: 2020-12-15
• Primary completion: 2021-08-30
• Completion: 2021-11-30
• First posted: 2020-08-25
• Last updated: 2023-02-08

Locations

2 sites across 1 country: Switzerland