Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT04488380
Clinical Performance of Glass Ionomer Versus Resin Composite Restorations
Clinical Performance of Glass Ionomer Versus Resin Composite Restorations Performed Without Rubber-Dam Isolation
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 56 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 15 Years – 19 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
The aim of this randomised-controlled, single-blind, split-mouth, and single-centre clinical trial was to evaluate the 2-year clinical performances of a high-viscosity glass ionomer and nanohybrid composite resin in occlusal restorations on mandibular second molar teeth in patients at risk for salivary contamination.
Detailed description
Occlusal carious lesions on the right and left mandibular second molars of 56 patients (26 females, 30 males) were restored in a split-mouth design. A high-viscosity glass ionomer (Hv-GIC) (Equia, GC) was used to restore the carious lesions in patients in the treatment group, while a nano-hybrid composite resin (GSO) (GrandioSO, Voco) was used for patients in the control group. Clinical evaluations of the restorations were performed at 1-week, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up appointments, according to the FDI criteria. Data were analysed using the Friedman's analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney U tests (α=0.05).
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OTHER | dental restoration | Restoration of carious mandibular 2nd molar teeth either with high viscosity glass ionomer or nanohybrid composite resin |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2015-10-12
- Primary completion
- 2016-04-20
- Completion
- 2016-04-20
- First posted
- 2020-07-28
- Last updated
- 2020-07-28
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04488380. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.