Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT04438317
Thoracic Drains in Intensive Care Units: Comparison of Seldinger and Surgical Methods
Thoracic Drains in Intensive Care Units. Comparison of Seldinger and Surgical Methods: A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Study
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 227 (actual)
- Sponsor
- University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This prospective randomized multicenter study is intended to investigate tolerance and effectiveness of thoracic drainage conducted by Seldinger technique with small drains, or by a surgical-like technique with large armed drains, in intensive care units patients.
Detailed description
Drainage of pleural effusion and pneumothorax is a common feature in Resuscitation, Intensive Care Units (ICU) and Continuing Care Units (CCU). Although they are associated with a low incidence of complications (ranging from 0 to 8%), some of these can become fatal if they are associated with a visceral puncture (liver, spleen, lung parenchyma or heart by instance). It has been reported in the literature that complications were greater in case of drainage with large diameter drains set up by so-called "surgical-like" technique. The choice of the type of chest tube is usually guided by the indication of drainage or the habits and / or experience of the practitioner. In the case of liquid pleural effusions, it may be preferable to use small diameter drains, whereas in the case of suspicious thick effusions such as empyema or blood, it may be preferable to use drainage drains of a larger diameter. However, results of retrospective analyzes seem to suggest the versatile and effective use of small-bore chest tubes in any of these indications without increasing complications' rates such as clogging. However, no prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) has studied this issue to date. Therefore, the investigators propose to perform a multicenter RCT in ICU and CCU patients requiring pleural drainage for any indication or underlying disease. This prospective RCT is intended to investigate tolerance and effectiveness of thoracic drainage conducted by Seldinger technique with small drains, or by a surgical-like technique with large armed drains. Furthermore, they want to estimate the respective costs, identify the difficulties related to both strategies, recognize associated practices (ultrasound-guidance, implantation site, operator's competence), and finally point out the secondary determinants of tolerance and effectiveness.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Pleural drainage procedure with Seldinger procedure | Pleural drainage using Seldinger technique. |
| PROCEDURE | Pleural drainage procedure with surgical-like technique | Pleural drainage using Surgical-like technique. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2020-05-29
- Primary completion
- 2023-04-04
- Completion
- 2023-06-28
- First posted
- 2020-06-18
- Last updated
- 2023-11-18
Locations
1 site across 1 country: France
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04438317. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.